One of fourteen models named Wave Connect first on the direct prompt; zero named iCapture. Wave Connect was named by ten of the fourteen models and iCapture by thirteen and Wave Connect carries 22 labels and iCapture 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the event lead capture apps page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Wave Connect and iCapture were named in the same answer thirty-six times, of the 65 answers naming Wave Connect and the 107 naming iCapture. In those answers iCapture took the first choice one time and Wave Connect seven.
| Model | DirectWC | ParaphraseWC | ComparativeWC | Budget-constrainedWC | Scale-constrainedWC | NegativeWC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | WC | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | WC | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | WC | WC | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | WC | WC | ||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | WC | WC | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | WC | |||||
| Kimi K2 | WC | WC | WC | WC | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | WC | WC | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | WC | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | WC | WC | WC |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Odd pricing structure ($10/lead); no handheld rental, app-only; not ideal for high-volume scanning.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Wave Connect and Captello are the two named in the recent review as the only platforms backing their security posture with named, audited certifications.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · first choice
“Better Alternatives to Consider ... Wave Connect — pay-per-lead model ($10/enriched lead), no per-user fees” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Wave Connect as the best default trade show badge scanning and lead retrieval tool” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“iCapture, Cvent LeadCapture, Whova and momencio's standard tier need organizer API / registration vendor access... That creates data ownership and consent ambiguity.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“iCapture has slightly lower average G2 ratings than other options and negative comments focus on their older UX and difficult setup process” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“iCapture, LeadCapture, Whova and momencio's standard tier all need the organizer's own system to work without one” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · soft negative
“iCapture | Enterprise teams with 10+ events/year | Proven offline reliability, strong ROI metrics” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“prioritize "universal" third-party lead capture apps (like Blinq, Popl, iCapture, or Mobly)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Need flexible trade-show capture across many events? Look at iCapture.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.