AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Event lead capture › iCapture vs Popl
Event lead capture apps · October 2026 Edition

iCapture vs Popl

Zero of fourteen models named iCapture first on the direct prompt; one named Popl. iCapture was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Popl by thirteen and iCapture carries 36 labels and Popl 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.

iCapture

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Popl

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%27%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3630A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, iCapture reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Blinq was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Blinq vs iCapture · Blinq vs Popl · Mobly Capture vs iCapture

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the event lead capture apps page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
iCaptureFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPopl
Direct01
Paraphrase201 against iCapture
Comparative111 against iCapture
Budget-constrained011 against Popl
Scale-constrained101 against iCapture
Negative114 against iCapture · 7 against Popl
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, iCapture and Popl were named in the same answer forty-nine times, of the 107 answers naming iCapture and the 88 naming Popl. In those answers Popl took the first choice four times and iCapture five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where iCapture and Popl stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
iCapture Popl first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, iCapture on the left and Popl on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where iCapture and Popl stood in it.

Popl first, iCapture an alternative

1 of 14 modelsiCapture was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniPopl alternatives: Captello, iCapture

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Blinq alternatives: B2Brain, Conexa, iCapture
Gemini 3.5 FlashBoothIQ, Mobly Capture alternatives: Blinq, Captello, Popl, iCapture
Grok 4.1 FastBlinq alternatives: Captello, Mobly Capture, iCapture, momencio
DeepSeek V4 FlashBlinq alternatives: B2Brain, Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App, Mobly Capture, iCapture
Kimi K2Wave Connect, momencio alternatives: Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App, iCapture
MiniMax M2.5B2Brain, Mobly Capture alternatives: Accelevents, Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App, Popl
Muse Glimmer 30BBlinq, momencio alternatives: iCapture

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarBlinq alternatives: B2Brain, Cvent LeadCapture, momencio
Mistral SmallBlinq, momencio alternatives: Mobly Capture
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashWhova alternatives: Attendify, Swapcard
GLM 4.7 FlashXMobly Capture alternatives: Blinq, Zuddl, momencio
GPT-6 LunaCvent iCapture alternatives: Captello, LeadCapture

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Popl leads by four points.
Popl4%#7 of 13
iCapture0%#11 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: iCapture leads at mid-market.
iCapture6%#5 of 13
Popl4%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
iCapture leads by twenty-one points.
iCapture23%#1 of 12
Popl2%#11 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about iCapture

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“iCapture, Cvent LeadCapture, Whova and momencio's standard tier need organizer API / registration vendor access... That creates data ownership and consent ambiguity.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“iCapture has slightly lower average G2 ratings than other options and negative comments focus on their older UX and difficult setup process” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“iCapture, LeadCapture, Whova and momencio's standard tier all need the organizer's own system to work without one” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · soft negative
“iCapture | Enterprise teams with 10+ events/year | Proven offline reliability, strong ROI metrics” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“prioritize "universal" third-party lead capture apps (like Blinq, Popl, iCapture, or Mobly)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Need flexible trade-show capture across many events? Look at iCapture.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Popl

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Many users across reviews complain the cost is too high... Multiple users report the app freezing and crashing during setup” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Popl - Inconsistent badge scanning - Returns no contact data at some conferences” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Popl announced a partnership with Apollo and RocketReach to power the data layer behind its enrichment... Enrichment tools that automatically add emails... raise GDPR Art.6 legal basis” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Blinq or Popl if you want an affordable, modern, seat-based app for your sales reps” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“prioritize "universal" third-party lead capture apps (like Blinq, Popl, iCapture, or Mobly)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Best overall budget pick: Blinq or Popl” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.