AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › BoothIQ · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

BoothIQ

39Judge labels
10First choices
3Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Event lead capture for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of BoothIQ →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In event lead capture · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BoothIQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Event lead capture appsMarketing6%6 of 707%14accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BoothIQ yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BoothIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash20002
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2001102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00202
Llama 4 Maverick00112
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210102
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase5 labels3
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labels6
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative8 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative39 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“BoothIQ (Best Overall Free Lead Capture App) ... is the top choice” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Event lead capture · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: BoothIQ (Best Free Option)” Kimi K2 · Event lead capture · budget prompt · first choice
“BoothIQ and Mobly are the modern standard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Event lead capture · direct prompt · first choice
“BoothIQ is the best lead capture app for networking events, and the only one on the market with unlimited leads for free.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event lead capture · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“but it does not have AI-powered follow-ups or field sales support” Llama 4 Maverick · Event lead capture · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BoothIQ, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BoothIQ was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Captello21 of 391Not among the top eight
Cvent LeadCapture20 of 390Not among the top eight
Whova10 of 390Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BoothIQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 39 answers that named BoothIQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blinq.me36
b2brain.com32
mobilocard.com21
mymanagementguide.com21
getboothiq.comYour site18
wavecnct.com18
g2.com16
bizzabo.com14
learn.g2.com14
tendro.com14

186 of the 204 domain citations in answers naming BoothIQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

getboothiq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BoothIQ takes 6% of first choices and Blinq takes 23%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “event lead capture app”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best event lead capture app”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
70 a month (“boothiq”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 42 a month
Searches its site ranks for
119 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it
505
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2025, as User Centric Marketing Institute, verified.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
6%
rank 6 of 70 in event lead capture
Segment leader
23%
Blinq
First choices
10 across its categories
Named in
39 answers
Its own site cited
in 39 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on getboothiq.com
75
subdomains included
Content
51
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog3312026-08-02
Conference or event802026-06-16
Comparison512026-07-31
Template or tool2undated
Glossary or explainer202026-04-12
Report or ebook1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page getboothiq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow BoothIQ

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BoothIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BoothIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BoothIQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where BoothIQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name BoothIQ, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at getboothiq.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.