AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › HG Insights · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

HG Insights

24Judge labels
6First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HG Insights was named 9 times in Market intelligence and 2 other categories, where Apollo.io led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business119 of 140
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 172
3%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise5 of 105
7%7 labels
under the label threshold
In market intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HG Insights for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Market intelligence platformsGTM data and infrastructure3%11 of 1720%5under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%
B2B intent data providersSales0%32 of 600%2under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Sales intelligence and contact dataSales0%24 of 520%2under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HG Insights yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HG Insights across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick10203
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels6
Paraphrase8 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“HG Insights - best for mid-market to enterprise organizations whose revenue motion is tied directly to the technologies their prospects use” Llama 4 Maverick · Market intelligence · direct prompt · first choice
“HockeyStack or HG Insights seem particularly well-suited” MiniMax M2.5 · Market intelligence · direct prompt · first choice
“Specializes in market intelligence platforms, helping B2B companies track technology adoption, market sizing, and competitive analysis.” Mistral Small · Market intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HG Insights, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HG Insights was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ZoomInfo22 of 245Not among the top eight
6sense13 of 242Not among the top eight
Demandbase11 of 243Not among the top eight
Apollo.io8 of 244Not among the top eight
Cognism8 of 241Not among the top eight
Klue8 of 240Not among the top eight
Bombora7 of 241Not among the top eight
AlphaSense6 of 240Not among the top eight
Crayon6 of 240Not among the top eight
G2 Buyer Intent5 of 240Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HG Insights. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 24 answers that named HG Insights and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hginsights.comYour site22
pipeline.zoominfo.com14
demandbase.com9
cognism.com7
salesmotion.io7
copy.ai6
hockeystack.com6
prospeo.io6
rb2b.com5
apollo.io4

Sixty-four of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming HG Insights came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hginsights.com/blog/top-10-b2b-market-intelligence-tools-ranked-by-data-coverage-and-accur10
pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/market-intelligence-tools8
hginsights.com/blog/buyer-intent-data-providers6
hockeystack.com/blog-posts/marketing-intelligence-tools6
prospeo.io/s/b2b-market-intelligence-tools6
hginsights.com/blog/b2b-data-providers5
hginsights.com/blog/best-market-intelligence-platforms-for-b2b-companies-in-20265
copy.ai/blog/market-intelligence-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on hginsights.com
1,318
subdomains included
Content
624
counted in the table below
Documentation
357
Product · Integration
52 · 5
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog211162026-09-22ABM, Enrichment
Glossary or explainer19722026-09-03Enrichment, Marketing automation
News or press6222026-09-01
Case study4202026-05-08ABM
Report or ebook38142026-09-10ABM
Webinar or virtual event3442026-09-10ABM
Podcast or video2562026-09-24ABM
Comparison1162026-09-17Enrichment, ABM
Template or tool302026-05-14CRM
Conference or event102025-12-15

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page hginsights.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ABM (23); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow HG Insights

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

HG Insights is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Revenue Growth Intelligence Solutions
hginsights.com
For
B2B technology teams
hginsights.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2
Customers named
Hyland SoftwareHiBob, Inc.EquinoxNiCEAmazon Web Services (AWS)CiscoNetAppEquinix
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What HG Insights's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: hginsights.com, trust.hginsights.com, hginsights.com/product, hginsights.com/case-studies, hginsights.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HG Insights's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HG Insights, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HG Insights by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where HG Insights is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name HG Insights, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hginsights.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.