AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Haus · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Haus

11Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Haus was named 3 times in Attribution & MMM, where Dreamdata led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Haus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Attribution and marketing mix modelingMarketing2%17 of 1230%3under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27%=heldSince September 2026: 1% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Haus held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Attribution & MMM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 95 → 57 of 108
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 1% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 1% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 18 of 112
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 → 32 of 101

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Attribution & MMM1%2%=heldSince September 2026: 1% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 21 → 17 of 123

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Haus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look closely at Recast or Haus” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Attribution & MMM · scale prompt · first choice
“Haus | Geo-incrementality testing | Brands testing new channels” Kimi K2 · Attribution & MMM · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Haus, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Haus was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Measured8 of 111Not among the top eight
Google Meridian6 of 112Not among the top eight
Northbeam5 of 112Not among the top eight
Recast5 of 111Not among the top eight
Rockerbox5 of 110Not among the top eight
Dreamdata4 of 112Not among the top eight
Meta Robyn4 of 110Not among the top eight
Cometly3 of 111Not among the top eight
HubSpot Marketing Hub3 of 111Not among the top eight
Triple Whale2 of 111Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Haus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Haus and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

improvado.io9
cometly.com8
admetrics.io6
aidigital.com4
liftlab.com4
measured.com4
gartner.com3
gitnux.org3
haus.ioYour site3
mcpanalytics.ai3

Forty-four of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Haus came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on haus.io
384
subdomains included
Content
269
counted in the table below
Documentation
8
Product · Integration
6 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog203undated
Case study3622026-08-24
Conference or event13undated
Glossary or explainer9undated
Comparison6undatedAttribution & MMM
Webinar or virtual event1undated
Report or ebook1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page haus.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Haus

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Haus is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered incrementality platform leading enterprises use to optimize tens of billions in annual marketing spend.
For
enterprises
Certifications
Sensiba SOC 2 Type 2SOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Customers named
IntuitOuraAG1FanDuelFox OneSharkNinjaMejuriWhoop
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Haus's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: haus.io, haus.io, haus.io/pricing, trust.haus.io, haus.io/use-cases/incrementality. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Haus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Haus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Haus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Haus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Haus, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at haus.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.