AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Dynatrace · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Dynatrace

6Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Dynatrace was named 2 times in Session replay, where Microsoft Clarity led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In session replay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Dynatrace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Session replay and heatmapsGTM data and infrastructure0%31 of 560%2under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dynatrace yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dynatrace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2001001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Statsig or Dynatrace: Privacy-by-design, customizable exclusions.” Grok 4.20 · Session replay · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dynatrace, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dynatrace was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Fullstory5 of 62Not among the top eight
Hotjar5 of 61Not among the top eight
Microsoft Clarity4 of 62Not among the top eight
Glassbox4 of 61Not among the top eight
LogRocket4 of 61Not among the top eight
Mouseflow4 of 60Not among the top eight
Quantum Metric4 of 60Not among the top eight
Contentsquare3 of 60Not among the top eight
Datadog3 of 60Not among the top eight
PostHog3 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dynatrace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named Dynatrace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

quantummetric.com4
userpilot.com4
learn.g2.com3
lokker.com3
motadata.com3
newrelic.com3
openreplay.com3
uxcam.com3
betterstack.com2
devopsschool.com2

Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Dynatrace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

dynatrace.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Dynatrace takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Clarity takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “session replay and heatmap tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best session replay and heatmap tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
22,200 a month (“dynatrace”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,106 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 62,738 a month
Searches its site ranks for
11,215 · 976 in the top three
Sites linking to it
14,570
Paid Google search
7 searches its ads show for, about 119 clicks and $3,941 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 52 image, 51 text, 17 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Dynatrace LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 92 in the year, 28 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 56 in session replay
Segment leader
33%
Microsoft Clarity
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
6 answers
Its own site cited
in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on dynatrace.com
12,045
subdomains included
Content
2,803
counted in the table below
Documentation
4,981
Product · Integration
125 · 130
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press1,870652026-09-25
Report or ebook424202026-09-28
Webinar or virtual event168202026-09-25
Case study131192026-09-28
Blog98392026-09-28
Conference or event54102026-09-28
Glossary or explainer3442026-09-23
Comparison2362026-09-09
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming

As the event pages on dynatrace.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page dynatrace.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Dynatrace

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Dynatrace is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Observability built for the age of AI
For
today’s digital businesses
Price stated
Reduce costs with clear, simple pricing dynatrace.com
Starting price
0 dynatrace.com
Free plan or trial
15-day free trial dynatrace.com
Integrations claimed
900 dynatrace.com/pricing
Certifications
ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIFedRAMP ModerateHIPAAACNCCPACSADESC CSP Security Standard
Hosting
across our global data center footprint
Customers named
Air France-KLMADTNextWeLab BankVirgin MoneyAgosFreedomPayBMO

What Dynatrace's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: dynatrace.com, dynatrace.com/pricing, trust.dynatrace.com, dynatrace.com/platform, dynatrace.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dynatrace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dynatrace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dynatrace by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Dynatrace is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dynatrace, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dynatrace.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.