Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 45 → 7 of 40
2 categories · Named, not rankedCore Commissions
17Judge labels
2First choices
6Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Core Commissions was named 8 times in Commissions and 1 other category, where CaptivateIQ led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 44
2%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 47
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In commissions · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Core Commissions for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales commissions and incentive compensation | Revenue operations | 2% | 12 of 47 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 83 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Core Commissions held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Commissions · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 46 → 37 of 46
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commissions | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 12 of 47 |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 83 of 123, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Core Commissions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Core Commissions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd start with Core Commissions' Launch plan” GPT-6 Luna · Commissions · budget prompt · first choice
“If your payee count is under 15 and you need more rule flexibility, Core Commissions offers a low per‑payee rate.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Commissions · budget prompt · alternative
“Also mentioned as an affordable tool for small businesses on a tighter budget, alongside Commissionly.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Commissions · budget prompt · alternative
“$12 per payee on starter plan, but requires at least 10 payees ($120/month minimum).” Grok 4.20 · Commissions · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms with documented issues (to avoid) ... Rep-facing interface is weak” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Commissions · negative prompt · hard negative
“rising dissatisfaction among modern revenue teams... lack of automation” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Commissions · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Core Commissions, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Core Commissions was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Core Commissions, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Core Commissions was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Core Commissions. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Core Commissions and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
qobra.co15
guideflow.com13
croclub.com12
everstage.com12
g2.com10
fitsmallbusiness.com7
captivateiq.com6
bigideasdb.com5
capterra.com5
firsthr.app5
Ninety of the ninety domain citations in answers naming Core Commissions came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on corecommissions.com
668
subdomains included
Content
157
counted in the table below
Documentation
29
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 119 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| News or press | 16 | undated | |||
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Finding affordable sales compensation solution without sacrificing features blog
- 2026-08-20Common commission rules core automates blog
- 2026-05-18Commission splits cobrokered rental deals blog
- 2026-04-20Pharma quotas and sales incentives blog
- 2026-03-27Territory based commission structures in pharma sales blog
- 2026-03-12Real estate commission advances blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page corecommissions.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Core Commissions
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Core Commissions is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Core Commissions is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- affordable web-based sales commission software that fully automates the calculation and management of complex sales commission and incentive compensation plans
- For
- sales organizations of all sizes
- Price stated
- Contact for pricing corecommissions.com
- Starting price
- 500 corecommissions.com
- Free plan or trial
- 30-day trial after setup corecommissions.com
- Customers named
- Engage Partners, Inc.Associates Insurance Group, Inc.NetWolvesCubex GroupTRU Staffing PartnersParagon Dealer ServicesWestern Resources Title8020 Consulting
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Core Commissions's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: corecommissions.com, corecommissions.com/pricing, corecommissions.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Core Commissions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Core Commissions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Core Commissions by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Core Commissions is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Core Commissions, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.