GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Core Commissions · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Core Commissions

15Judge labels

0First choices

11Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Core Commissions was named 7 times in Commissions, where Everstage led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business47 of 57

under the label threshold

Mid-market47 of 51

under the label threshold

Enterprise56 of 59

under the label threshold

In commissions · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Core Commissions for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales commissions and incentive compensation	Revenue operations	0%	47 of 51	57%	7	under 10 labels · led by Everstage at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Core Commissions yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Core Commissions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative11 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“invest in a dedicated platform like QCommission or Core Commissions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Manual workarounds required, broken integrations, opaque calculations that damage trust” Mistral Small · Commissions · negative prompt · hard negative

“Verdict: Avoid unless you have very specific needs that no other platform can meet” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Commissions · negative prompt · hard negative

“Sparse reviews highlight integration failures, manual workarounds, poor support—skip unless exact fit.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative

“Steep learning curve, outdated/non-intuitive interface for sales reps” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Core Commissions, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Core Commissions was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Everstage11 of 154Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ11 of 153Not in the top three

Model N9 of 150Not in the top three

NetCommissions9 of 150Not in the top three

Visdum8 of 151Not in the top three

Salesforce Spiff8 of 150Not in the top three

QuotaPath7 of 152Not in the top three

SAP Commissions7 of 150Not in the top three

Easy-Commission6 of 150Not in the top three

Varicent6 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Core Commissions. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 15 answers that named Core Commissions and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

captivateiq.com1

cmsreport.com1

emelia.io1

everstage.com1

forma.ai1

getcentify.com1

gitnux.org1

guideflow.com1

learn.g2.com1

qobra.co1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Core Commissions came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

captivateiq.com/1

captivateiq.com/blog/best-sales-compensation-software1

cmsreport.com/articles/top-8-sales-commission-management-software-2026-181511

emelia.io/hub/sales-compensation-software-tools1

everstage.com/10-best-commission-management-software1

everstage.com/10-best-sales-commission-software1

everstage.com/10-best-sales-commission-tracking-software1

forma.ai/resources/article/commissions-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Core Commissions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Core Commissions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at corecommissions.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.