| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 115 of 116 | 75% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| CRM data quality and deduplication | Revenue operations | 0% | 61 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 43% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) tools like DealHub, Salesforce CPQ, and Conga ... do not directly support the core functions of value selling” Mistral Small · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative
“mentioned for value-based pricing, but they are much higher priced than a basic CRM” Muse Glimmer 30B · Value selling · budget prompt · soft negative
“Handle pricing logic and contract generation, not value quantification” MiniMax M2.5 · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Conga and are not a share of its labels.
Sixty-one of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Conga came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 473 | 4 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Case study | 145 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| News or press | 76 | 3 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 56 | 2 | 2026-07-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 24 | 0 | 2025-09-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 22 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 3 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 0 | 2026-04-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-21 |
As the event pages on conga.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page conga.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Conga's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: conga.com, conga.com/pricing, conga.com/platform, conga.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conga's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conga, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conga by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: