AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Conga · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Conga

22Judge labels
4First choices
4Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Pricing optimization for enterprise buyers
Rank 115 of 116 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 75% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In value selling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Conga for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Value selling toolsSales0%115 of 11675%4under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21%
CRM data quality and deduplicationRevenue operations0%61 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 43%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Conga yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Conga across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500011
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels2
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) tools like DealHub, Salesforce CPQ, and Conga ... do not directly support the core functions of value selling” Mistral Small · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative
“mentioned for value-based pricing, but they are much higher priced than a basic CRM” Muse Glimmer 30B · Value selling · budget prompt · soft negative
“Handle pricing logic and contract generation, not value quantification” MiniMax M2.5 · Value selling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Conga, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conga was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Pricefx10 of 225Not among the top eight
Vendavo9 of 221Not among the top eight
Zilliant9 of 220Not among the top eight
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management6 of 222Not among the top eight
PandaDoc6 of 220Not among the top eight
DealHub5 of 220Not among the top eight
Enable4 of 220Not among the top eight
Qwilr4 of 220Not among the top eight
Salesforce CPQ4 of 220Not among the top eight
Ecosystems3 of 222Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conga. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Conga and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com12
guideflow.com12
gartner.com8
conga.comYour site7
presalespulse.com6
businesswire.com5
capterra.com5
globenewswire.com5
gitnux.org4
learn.g2.com4

Sixty-one of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Conga came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

conga.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Conga takes 0% of first choices and Minoa takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “value selling tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best value selling tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
27,100 a month (“conga”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,882 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 46,363 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,418 · 311 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,867
Paid Google search
8 searches its ads show for, about 42 clicks and $224 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 97 text, 18 video, 5 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2022, as AppExtremes LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 53 in the year, 67 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 115 of 116 in value selling
Segment leader
21%
Minoa
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
22 answers
Its own site cited
in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on conga.com
3,830
subdomains included
Content
819
counted in the table below
Documentation
2,278
Product · Integration
52 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog47342026-09-18
Case study14522026-09-09
News or press7632026-08-12
Webinar or virtual event5622026-07-22
Conference or event2402025-09-17
Report or ebook2212026-08-03
Comparison1232026-09-08
Glossary or explainer1002026-04-15
Template or tool112026-08-21

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on conga.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page conga.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Conga

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Conga is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Pricing Built for Your Business
Price stated
Conga believes in working with you to create a customized pricing plan that meets the specific demands of your business. Click here to request a quote. conga.com/pricing
Certifications
certifiedTrained and certified
Customers named
Autism CRCHomeless LinkElsevier
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Conga's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: conga.com, conga.com/pricing, conga.com/platform, conga.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conga's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conga, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conga by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Conga is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Conga, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at conga.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.