GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Competely · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Competely

12Judge labels

3First choices

1Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Competely was named 4 times in Competitive intel and 1 other category, where Kompyte led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business9 of 85

under the label threshold

Mid-market37 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In competitive intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Competely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Competitive intelligence tools	Marketing	0%	37 of 86	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38%
Market intelligence platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	57 of 172	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Competely yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Competely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The "No Budget / Lean Team" Alternative: Competely or Rival Radar” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Competitive intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“An AI-driven competitor analysis tool... Starts at $39/month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Market intelligence · budget prompt · alternative

“Competely (Best for Rapid Competitor Analysis)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Competitive intel · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“smaller tools like Competely ($39/mo self-serve reports, lighter on depth)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Competitive intel · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Competely, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Competely was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Klue12 of 122Not among the top eight

Crayon12 of 120Not among the top eight

Semrush9 of 121Not among the top eight

Visualping8 of 122Not among the top eight

Kompyte7 of 122Not among the top eight

SpyFu6 of 122Not among the top eight

Ahrefs4 of 120Not among the top eight

Contify4 of 120Not among the top eight

Similarweb4 of 120Not among the top eight

ZoomInfo4 of 120Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Competely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Competely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

competely.aiYour site11

unkover.com6

visualping.io6

contify.com5

copy.ai5

pipeline.zoominfo.com5

autobound.ai4

linkeddit.com4

myintelbrief.com4

saashero.net4

Forty-three of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Competely came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

competely.ai/guides/best-competitor-analysis-tools8

unkover.com/blog/competitive-intelligence-tools5

visualping.io/blog/top-free-competitive-intelligence-tools5

copy.ai/blog/market-intelligence-tools4

autobound.ai/blog/top-15-competitive-intelligence-tools-20263

competely.ai/alternatives3

contify.com/resources/blog/best-competitive-intelligence-tools3

demandbase.com/blog/market-intelligence-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

competely.ai ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Competely takes 0% of first choices and Kompyte takes 38%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “competitive intelligence tool”

Position for “best competitive intelligence tool”

–

not in the top ten

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 37 of 86 in competitive intel

Segment leader

38%

Kompyte

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 12 answers
Its own site cited: in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Competely

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Competely; a claim can dispute any of them.

Competely (AI-Native) 1

Follow Competely

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Competely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Competely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Competely by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Competely is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Competely, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.