AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › CallHippo · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

CallHippo

13Judge labels
3First choices
4Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CallHippo was named 7 times in Contact center and 1 other category, where Five9 led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In contact center · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CallHippo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Contact center platformsCustomer2%17 of 8633%3under 10 labels · led by Five9 at 18%
Call tracking platformsMarketing0%53 of 6350%4under 10 labels · led by CallRail at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CallHippo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CallHippo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Freshdesk Contact Center free starter or CallHippo $1/mo Basic is the lowest entry point.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Contact center · budget prompt · first choice
“CallHippo may be worth considering, since G2 highlights its competitive pay-per-user pricing for small businesses” Perplexity Sonar · Contact center · budget prompt · alternative
“CallHippo — Most Affordable Entry Point” Kimi K2 · Call tracking · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The low Trustpilot score combined with the extreme gap between marketing claims and real-world billing behavior makes this a high-risk choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Call tracking · negative prompt · hard negative
“Around 65% of users express concerns about hidden charges and a lack of transparency in pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Contact center · negative prompt · soft negative
“long‑standing unresolved issues with incoming calls and delayed or unhelpful support responses” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Call tracking · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CallHippo, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CallHippo was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CallRail7 of 131Not among the top eight
Aircall4 of 130Not among the top eight
WhatConverts3 of 133Not among the top eight
CallScaler3 of 131Not among the top eight
LiveAgent3 of 131Not among the top eight
Nimbata3 of 131Not among the top eight
CallTrackingMetrics3 of 130Not among the top eight
CloudTalk3 of 130Not among the top eight
Nextiva3 of 130Not among the top eight
RingCentral Events3 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CallHippo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named CallHippo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com9
blog.hubspot.com8
cloudtalk.io7
capterra.com4
cleverly.co4
dialpad.com4
g2.com4
nextiva.com4
callrail.com3
emailanalytics.com3

Fifty of the fifty domain citations in answers naming CallHippo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on callhippo.com
936
subdomains included
Content
445
counted in the table below
Documentation
324
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog363142026-09-28CRM
Comparison40142026-07-28
Glossary or explainer2822026-07-02
Case study602024-11-25
Template or tool402026-06-02
Conference or event312026-07-02
Webinar or virtual event112026-07-23
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page callhippo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow CallHippo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CallHippo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CallHippo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CallHippo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CallHippo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CallHippo, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at callhippo.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.