AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › CallTrackingMetrics · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

CallTrackingMetrics

138Judge labels
16First choices
36Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Call tracking for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 63 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 49 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CallTrackingMetrics →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In call tracking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CallTrackingMetrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Call tracking platformsMarketing13%2 of 6320%49accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CallTrackingMetrics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CallTrackingMetrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511013
GPT-5.4 mini11103
Gemini 3.5 Flash04026
Perplexity Sonar10113
Grok 4.1 Fast03115
Mistral Small11013
DeepSeek V4 Flash13015
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash03014
Kimi K212014
GLM 4.7 FlashX02013
MiniMax M2.503104
GPT-6 Luna11002
Muse Glimmer 30B12003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct28 labels5
Paraphrase16 labels1
Comparative32 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels7
Scale-constrained17 labels3
Negative31 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative138 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CallTrackingMetrics (CTM) is recommended for mid-market to enterprise companies with contact centers, high call volume, or complex routing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Call tracking · direct prompt · first choice
“best for mid-market agencies and contact centers ... sits between CallRail's SMB focus and Invoca's enterprise depth” Muse Glimmer 30B · Call tracking · direct prompt · first choice
“Platforms like Invoca and CallTrackingMetrics are built specifically for enterprise scale” Kimi K2 · Call tracking · scale prompt · first choice
“My default pick is CallTrackingMetrics (CTM) for a mid-market B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · Call tracking · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High risk of billing surprises and support frustration... Powerful but risky. Only consider if you have a dedicated project manager and a legal review of their contract.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Call tracking · negative prompt · hard negative
“you should approach with caution or consider avoiding due to common complaints and limitations” Mistral Small · Call tracking · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms like CallTrackingMetrics (CTM) and Invoca are incredibly powerful, but they are built for enterprise call centers... avoid these enterprise-level tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Call tracking · negative prompt · soft negative
“a strong platform for more complex call handling, but even vendor guidance frames it as a tradeoff: you get deeper sales-ops controls, but you give up simplicity” Perplexity Sonar · Call tracking · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CallTrackingMetrics, over the 138 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CallTrackingMetrics was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Ringba27 of 1380Not among the top eight
HubSpot Call Tracking25 of 1381Not among the top eight
CloudTalk24 of 1380Not among the top eight
Marchex21 of 1381Not among the top eight
DialogTech12 of 1380Not among the top eight
Talkdesk11 of 1380Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CallTrackingMetrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 137 of the 138 answers that named CallTrackingMetrics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

callrail.com93
blog.hubspot.com75
whatconverts.com69
cloudtalk.io65
viasocket.com61
learn.g2.com53
g2.com46
emailanalytics.com45
nimbata.com44
swydo.com42

593 of the 593 domain citations in answers naming CallTrackingMetrics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

calltrackingmetrics.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CallTrackingMetrics takes 13% of first choices and CallRail takes 43%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “call tracking platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best call tracking platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,900 a month (“calltrackingmetrics”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
22 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,502 a month
Searches its site ranks for
45 · 18 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,382
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
15 ads · 9 text, 6 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Call Tracking Metrics LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 5 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
13%
rank 2 of 63 in call tracking
Segment leader
43%
CallRail
First choices
16 across its categories
Named in
138 answers
Its own site cited
in 137 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on calltrackingmetrics.com
583
subdomains included
Content
399
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
17 · 115
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog15072026-09-15SEO, CRM
News or press14062026-09-23CRM
Podcast or video6422026-08-26CRM, SEO
Case study2402026-05-20
Report or ebook802026-03-06
Webinar or virtual event602025-11-06SEO
Glossary or explainer602026-06-09
Comparison102024-03-07
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page calltrackingmetrics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as CallTrackingMetrics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CallTrackingMetrics; a claim can dispute any of them.
CallTrackingMetrics (CTM) 27

Follow CallTrackingMetrics

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CallTrackingMetrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CallTrackingMetrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CallTrackingMetrics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CallTrackingMetrics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CallTrackingMetrics, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at calltrackingmetrics.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where CallTrackingMetrics is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

CallTrackingMetrics is among the products AI models recommend first in Call tracking platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Call tracking platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/call-tracking/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/calltrackingmetrics--call-tracking-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Call tracking platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Call tracking platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Call tracking platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/call-tracking/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/calltrackingmetrics--call-tracking-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Call tracking platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Call tracking platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Call tracking platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/call-tracking/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/calltrackingmetrics--call-tracking-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Call tracking platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Call tracking platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.