| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call tracking platforms | Marketing | 13% | 2 of 63 | 20% | 49 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“CallTrackingMetrics (CTM) is recommended for mid-market to enterprise companies with contact centers, high call volume, or complex routing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Call tracking · direct prompt · first choice
“best for mid-market agencies and contact centers ... sits between CallRail's SMB focus and Invoca's enterprise depth” Muse Glimmer 30B · Call tracking · direct prompt · first choice
“Platforms like Invoca and CallTrackingMetrics are built specifically for enterprise scale” Kimi K2 · Call tracking · scale prompt · first choice
“My default pick is CallTrackingMetrics (CTM) for a mid-market B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · Call tracking · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“High risk of billing surprises and support frustration... Powerful but risky. Only consider if you have a dedicated project manager and a legal review of their contract.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Call tracking · negative prompt · hard negative
“you should approach with caution or consider avoiding due to common complaints and limitations” Mistral Small · Call tracking · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms like CallTrackingMetrics (CTM) and Invoca are incredibly powerful, but they are built for enterprise call centers... avoid these enterprise-level tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Call tracking · negative prompt · soft negative
“a strong platform for more complex call handling, but even vendor guidance frames it as a tradeoff: you get deeper sales-ops controls, but you give up simplicity” Perplexity Sonar · Call tracking · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 137 of the 138 answers that named CallTrackingMetrics and are not a share of its labels.
593 of the 593 domain citations in answers naming CallTrackingMetrics came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 150 | 7 | 2026-09-15 | SEO, CRM | |
| News or press | 140 | 6 | 2026-09-23 | CRM | |
| Podcast or video | 64 | 2 | 2026-08-26 | CRM, SEO | |
| Case study | 24 | 0 | 2026-05-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2026-03-06 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2025-11-06 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | 0 | 2024-03-07 |
Every page calltrackingmetrics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CallTrackingMetrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CallTrackingMetrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CallTrackingMetrics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
CallTrackingMetrics is among the products AI models recommend first in Call tracking platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.