AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Invoca · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Invoca

134Judge labels
35First choices
34Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
62% in Call tracking for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 63 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 30% of its 43 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Invoca →
By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
In call tracking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Invoca for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Call tracking platformsMarketing6%6 of 6330%43criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Invoca yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Invoca across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini03003
Gemini 3.5 Flash02024
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast12025
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash11013
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K211035
GLM 4.7 FlashX01023
MiniMax M2.501113
GPT-6 Luna03003
Muse Glimmer 30B02114

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct29 labels14
Paraphrase22 labels11
Comparative29 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels4
Scale-constrained19 labels6
Negative22 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative134 labels in all, every segment counted; 35 of the 52 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Platforms like Invoca and CallTrackingMetrics are built specifically for enterprise scale” Kimi K2 · Call tracking · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend shortlisting CallTrackingMetrics and Invoca” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Call tracking · scale prompt · first choice
“Shortlist 3-5 (e.g., CallRail, Invoca)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Call tracking · scale prompt · first choice
“Invoca owns the enterprise space with sophisticated AI and real-time capabilities—but at a significant cost and complexity premium.” Kimi K2 · Call tracking · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms to avoid or scrutinize closely: - Invoca — commonly positioned for enterprise marketing and contact centers, with custom enterprise pricing rather than SMB-friendly transparent pricing.” Perplexity Sonar · Call tracking · negative prompt · hard negative
“custom pricing (often 6-7 figures/year) makes it overkill/too pricey for mid-sized unless you have complex needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Call tracking · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Only if you're enterprise-scale with complex compliance needs and budget for custom AI models (premium pricing)” Kimi K2 · Call tracking · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Avoid Invoca unless: You have enterprise-level budget... may be overkill and overpriced for mid-market” Kimi K2 · Call tracking · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Invoca, over the 134 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoca was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Marchex29 of 1342Not among the top eight
Ringba26 of 1340Not among the top eight
HubSpot Call Tracking18 of 1341Not among the top eight
CloudTalk18 of 1340Not among the top eight
DialogTech17 of 1340Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Invoca. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 132 of the 134 answers that named Invoca and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

callrail.com93
blog.hubspot.com67
cloudtalk.io66
whatconverts.com65
viasocket.com62
g2.com46
learn.g2.com45
cleverly.co40
emailanalytics.com38
invoca.comYour site38

522 of the 560 domain citations in answers naming Invoca came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

invoca.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Invoca takes 6% of first choices and CallRail takes 43%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “call tracking platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best call tracking platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“invoca”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
134 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 6,960 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,398 · 62 in the top three
Sites linking to it
8,339
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
28 ads · 28 text · 20 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as Invoca, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 12 in the year, 16 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
6%
rank 6 of 63 in call tracking
Segment leader
43%
CallRail
First choices
35 across its categories
Named in
134 answers
Its own site cited
in 132 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on invoca.com
3,794
subdomains included
Content
2,081
counted in the table below
Documentation
917
Product · Integration
88 · 132
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,331712026-09-23SEO
Report or ebook224undated
News or press215undatedVideo ads
Case study122undated
Webinar or virtual event7602026-05-14
Glossary or explainer39162026-09-10
Conference or event3662026-07-07
Podcast or video1802026-05-14
Comparison1742026-07-07
Template or tool322026-07-07
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page invoca.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (18); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Invoca

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Invoca's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Invoca, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Invoca by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Invoca is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Invoca, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at invoca.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.