GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Breakout · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Breakout

10Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Breakout was named 6 times in Conversational mktg and 1 other category, where Tidio led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business29 of 72

under the label threshold

Mid-market18 of 87

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In conversational mktg · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Breakout for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Conversational marketing platforms	Marketing	2%	18 of 87	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13%
AI SDR agents	Sales	0%	29 of 77	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Breakout yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Breakout across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best Agile, AI-Native Option: Breakout ... is a rapidly growing market favorite” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Conversational mktg · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Breakout stands out as the only inbound AI SDR that identifies visitors, engages them in real time” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI SDR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Breakout, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Breakout was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Artisan Ava7 of 101Not among the top eight

11x4 of 101Not among the top eight

AiSDR4 of 100Not among the top eight

Qualified Piper4 of 100Not among the top eight

Salesforce Agentforce SDR4 of 100Not among the top eight

Salesforge Agent Frank3 of 101Not among the top eight

Clay3 of 100Not among the top eight

Intercom3 of 100Not among the top eight

Regie.ai3 of 100Not among the top eight

Drift2 of 101Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Breakout. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Breakout and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getbreakout.aiYour site7

artisan.co4

qualified.com4

salesforge.ai4

11x.ai3

getvoip.com3

ai.g2.com2

amplemarket.com2

askdialog.com2

fin.ai2

Twenty-six of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Breakout came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

artisan.co/blog/the-best-ai-sdrs4

salesforge.ai/blog/ai-sales-agents4

getbreakout.ai/blog/10-best-ai-sdr-agents-20263

getbreakout.ai/blog/best-conversational-marketing-tools-20263

getvoip.com/ai-sdr-agents3

askdialog.com/resources/best-conversational-commerce-platforms2

fin.ai/learn/best-ai-sdr-tools2

jotform.com/blog/conversational-marketing-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on getbreakout.ai

239

subdomains included

Content

208

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

3 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	109	96	2026-09-28	AI SDR
Comparison	90	88	2026-09-28
Case study	6	6	2026-09-28	CRM
Glossary or explainer	2	2	2026-09-09	SEO
Report or ebook	1	1	2026-09-28

Most recent

2026-09-28State of chatbots in 2025 ebook report or ebook
2026-09-28Drift alternative comparison
2026-09-28Qualified alternative comparison
2026-09-28Intercom alternative comparison
2026-09-281mind alternative comparison
2026-09-28Warmly alternative comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page getbreakout.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Breakout

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Breakout; a claim can dispute any of them.

Breakout (getbreakout.ai) 1

Follow Breakout

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Breakout is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Inbound AI SDR
getbreakout.ai
For: AI-pilled marketing teams
getbreakout.ai
Price stated: Deanonymization starts at $1500/mo. AI SDR for $2500/mo. Custom plans for enterprise. Starts at $500/mo. Starts at $2k/mo. Let's chat getbreakout.ai/pricing
Starting price: Starts at $500/mo getbreakout.ai/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start free trial getbreakout.ai
Integrations claimed: 55 getbreakout.ai
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIGDPRSOC 2
Hosting: EU-region processing
Customers named: KetchBeautiful.aiBartiHackerEarthTeamOhanaRecruit CRMNiuralMaximEyes

What Breakout's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: getbreakout.ai, getbreakout.ai/pricing, trust.getbreakout.ai, getbreakout.ai/product/engage, getbreakout.ai/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Breakout's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Breakout, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Breakout by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Breakout is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Breakout, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.