GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Breakout · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Breakout

12Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Breakout was named 5 times in AI SDR and 1 other category, where Apollo.io led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Breakout for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
AI SDR agentsSales0%25 of 710%4under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 20%
Lead routing and managementSales0%56 of 1040%1under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Breakout yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Breakout across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10102
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Breakout if website visitors are already arriving and you want an autonomous inbound agent that qualifies and books without handoff” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI SDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Breakout leads the inbound AI SDR category” Llama 4 Maverick · AI SDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Breakout or Qualified if your priority is inbound lead conversion.” Perplexity Sonar · AI SDR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Breakout, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Breakout was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AiSDR10 of 123Not in the top three
Artisan10 of 122Not in the top three
11x9 of 121Not in the top three
Amplemarket8 of 121Not in the top three
Qualified8 of 120Not in the top three
Salesforce Agentforce6 of 121Not in the top three
Apollo.io6 of 120Not in the top three
1mind5 of 120Not in the top three
Clodura AI5 of 120Not in the top three
Intercom5 of 120Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Breakout. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 12 answers that named Breakout and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getbreakout.ai4
getvoip.com4
11x.ai3
amplemarket.com3
salesforge.ai3
snov.io3
artisan.co2
clay.com2
lyzr.ai2
pickaxe.co2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Breakout came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Breakout's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Breakout, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at breakout.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack