GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Ataccama · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Ataccama

19Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ataccama was named 8 times in CRM data quality and 1 other category, where Insycle led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business110 of 115

under the label threshold

Mid-market34 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise26 of 104

under the label threshold

In crm data quality · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ataccama for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM data quality and deduplication	Revenue operations	0%	34 of 104	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34%
Data management platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	72 of 183	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Segment at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ataccama yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ataccama across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“While Talend and Ataccama are powerful enterprise-grade platforms, they are often over-engineered for SMB/mid-market teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM data quality · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ataccama, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ataccama was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Informatica14 of 190Not in the top three

DemandTools13 of 196Not in the top three

Apollo.io13 of 191Not in the top three

Cleanlist12 of 195Not in the top three

Insycle11 of 191Not in the top three

ZoomInfo Operations10 of 192Not in the top three

Talend10 of 190Not in the top three

ZoomInfo10 of 190Not in the top three

Cloudingo7 of 191Not in the top three

Cognism6 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ataccama. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 19 answers that named Ataccama and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com2

domo.com2

fortegrp.com2

gartner.com2

alation.com1

businesswith.com1

cdp.com1

clicdata.com1

clickup.com1

docs.ataccama.comYour site1

Thirteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Ataccama came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

domo.com/learn/article/best-data-management-platforms2

fortegrp.com/insights/top-19-data-management-tools-platforms-in-the-usa2

gartner.com/reviews/market/data-management-platforms2

alation.com/blog/data-management-software1

businesswith.com/data-management-platform1

capterra.com/data-management-platforms-software1

capterra.com/data-management-software/s/small-businesses1

cdp.com/glossary/data-management-platform-dmp-vendors1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ataccama's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ataccama, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ataccama.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.