GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › DemandTools · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

DemandTools

135Judge labels
18First choices
28Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
27% in CRM data quality for enterprise buyers
Rank 4 of 104 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 47 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In crm data quality · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DemandTools for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CRM data quality and deduplicationRevenue operations6%4 of 10415%47accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DemandTools yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DemandTools across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01124
Perplexity Sonar12014
Grok 4.1 Fast03115
Mistral Small23016
DeepSeek V4 Flash11114
Llama 4 Maverick02204
Qwen 3.7 Flash30003
Kimi K203216
GLM 4.7 FlashX11204
MiniMax M2.513004

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct28 labels4
Paraphrase21 labels8
Comparative29 labels9not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels2
Scale-constrained19 labels4
Negative20 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative135 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 29 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“DemandTools is widely considered the industry standard. It is powerful, industrial-grade, and trusted by thousands of Salesforce administrators.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM data quality · direct prompt · first choice
“The long-standing gold standard for Salesforce administrators. It is technically robust but has a steeper learning curve” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM data quality · comparative prompt · first choice
“A deduplication tool (DemandTools or RingLead for Salesforce; Cleanlist or Plauti for multi-CRM)” MiniMax M2.5 · CRM data quality · scale prompt · first choice
“for Salesforce deduplication, DemandTools is consistently highlighted” Perplexity Sonar · CRM data quality · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the $999+/year pricing can be prohibitive for smaller organizations” Mistral Small · CRM data quality · negative prompt · hard negative
“Consider only if you're a Salesforce-heavy org at scale; ... pricier (custom quote, ~$500+/mo), and Salesforce-only.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CRM data quality · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“expensive enterprise data orchestration tools like RingLead (ZoomInfo) or DemandTools (Validity) are often out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM data quality · budget prompt · soft negative
“it is more specialized and less "limited-budget" friendly than the cheapest options” Perplexity Sonar · CRM data quality · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DemandTools, over the 135 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DemandTools was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Insycle89 of 13532Not in the top three
Cleanlist64 of 13521Not in the top three
ZoomInfo Operations62 of 1357Not in the top three
Cloudingo59 of 1355Not in the top three
Informatica44 of 1352Not in the top three
Apollo.io36 of 1352Not in the top three
Dedupely34 of 1355Not in the top three
Openprise33 of 1352Not in the top three
ZoomInfo33 of 1350Not in the top three
Plauti24 of 1350Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DemandTools. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 135 answers that named DemandTools and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cleanlist.ai18
cognism.com18
g2.com14
clearout.io13
findymail.com13
integrate.io11
syncmatters.com9
worldmetrics.org9
morsoftware.com8
nrev.ai8

121 of the 121 domain citations in answers naming DemandTools came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as DemandTools

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DemandTools; a claim can dispute any of them.
DemandTools (Validity) 7Validity DemandTools 4DemandTools (by Validity) 3DemandTools by Validity 3
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DemandTools's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DemandTools, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at demandtools.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack