Every category where a model named Dedupely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM data quality and deduplication	Revenue operations	6%	5 of 104	9%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dedupely yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dedupely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	2	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels4

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained18 labels8

Scale-constrained11 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“This tool stands out for budget-limited companies: it has a free tier available with paid plans starting from $49/month.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CRM data quality · budget prompt · first choice

“If your budget is extremely tight and your only problem is duplicates in a single CRM, choose Dedupely.” Perplexity Sonar · CRM data quality · budget prompt · first choice

“Dedupely is the top choice” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM data quality · budget prompt · first choice

“If you need basic deduplication quickly: Dedupely at $40/month is simple and straightforward” MiniMax M2.5 · CRM data quality · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Review summaries for tools like Dedupely explicitly note that they're mainly focused on deduplication and may not cover advanced data management needs” GPT-5.4 mini · CRM data quality · negative prompt · soft negative

“Good for ease of use, but less comprehensive for broader data quality workflows.” GPT-5.4 mini · CRM data quality · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dedupely, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dedupely was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Insycle48 of 5921Not in the top three

DemandTools34 of 592Not in the top three

Cloudingo23 of 592Not in the top three

ZoomInfo Operations21 of 597Not in the top three

Cleanlist19 of 594Not in the top three

Koalify18 of 595Not in the top three

DataGroomr17 of 590Not in the top three

Plauti16 of 590Not in the top three

HubSpot Operations Hub10 of 590Not in the top three

OpenRefine9 of 592Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dedupely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 59 answers that named Dedupely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com9

dataladder.com5

pipeline.zoominfo.com5

landbase.com4

leadangel.com4

cleanlist.ai3

cognism.com3

datamadeeazy.com3

datastackhub.com3

dedupe.lyYour site3

Thirty-nine of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Dedupely came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

dataladder.com/best-data-deduplication-software-compared5

g2.com/categories/data-quality/f/crm5

landbase.com/blog/deduplication-tools-sales-ops-teams4

leadangel.com/blog/abm/data-deduplication-software-for-b2b-and-crm-data4

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-03-27-data-quality-tools3

datamadeeazy.com/blog/best-crm-deduplication-tool3

datastackhub.com/top-tools/data-deduplication-tools3

dedupe.ly/3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dedupely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dedupely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dedupe.ly is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.