Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 of 87, unchanged
1 category · RankedCloudingo
96Judge labels
13First choices
18Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in CRM data quality for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 99 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 33 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Cloudingo →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business19 of 96
0%22 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market5 of 99
4%33 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 103
19%41 labels
accepted challenger
In crm data quality · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Cloudingo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM data quality and deduplication | Revenue operations | 4% | 5 of 99 | 12% | 33 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Cloudingo held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CRM data quality · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 13 of 90
Enterprise▲+15Since September 2026: 5% → 21%, +15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
21%from 5% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 6 → 2 of 93
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM data quality | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 5 of 99 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Cloudingo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Cloudingo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct23 labels5
Paraphrase12 labels1
Comparative21 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels6
Scale-constrained14 labels1
Negative10 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative96 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Salesforce-only and want set-and-forget merging with undo: Cloudingo is the most cited workhorse” Muse Glimmer 30B · CRM data quality · direct prompt · first choice
“Salesforce only and you want enterprise-grade, automated prevention: DemandTools or Cloudingo.” Muse Glimmer 30B · CRM data quality · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“look at cloud-native, user-friendly tools like Cloudingo, Insycle, or DataGroomr” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM data quality · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Plauti or Cloudingo if you prioritize native Salesforce integration, real-time prevention, and auditability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM data quality · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Don't buy ... Cloudingo (~$2,500/yr) unless you have large Salesforce databases” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CRM data quality · budget prompt · hard negative
“Dedupely, Cloudingo, etc., need careful ruleset tuning to avoid over-merging (data loss) or under-merging” Grok 4.20 · CRM data quality · negative prompt · soft negative
“many popular third-party tools (like Cloudingo) start at $2,500/year” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM data quality · budget prompt · soft negative
“Cloudingo if your problem spans multiple systems” GPT-6 Luna · CRM data quality · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cloudingo, over the 96 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudingo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cloudingo, over the 96 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudingo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cloudingo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 96 answers that named Cloudingo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cleanlist.ai64
cognism.com42
pipeline.zoominfo.com40
syncmatters.com37
g2.com34
prospeo.io33
integrate.io30
clearout.io28
dataladder.com27
insycle.com21
356 of the 356 domain citations in answers naming Cloudingo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cloudingo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cloudingo takes 4% of first choices and Insycle takes 43%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cloudingo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cloudingo takes 4% of first choices and Insycle takes 43%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “crm data quality and deduplication tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best crm data quality and deduplication tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“cloudingo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 271 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 110 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 569
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 5 of 99 in CRM data quality
Segment leader
43%
Insycle
- First choices
- 13 across its categories
- Named in
- 96 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 93 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cloudingo.com
228
subdomains included
Content
141
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
9 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 112 | 7 | 2026-09-15 | CRM | |
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2025-02-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2025-09-30 | ||
| News or press | 4 | 0 | 2018-08-01 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2025-03-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-04-21 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2025-04-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Why salesforce data cleanup projects always become prevention projects blog
- 2026-09-01Claudeforce risks data quality blog
- 2026-08-25Salesforce data quality has two major problems identity and reachability blog
- 2026-08-21Why salesforce duplicate rules fail blog
- 2026-08-05The upstream approach using smart forms to prevent duplicates from being created in the first place blog
- 2026-07-22How to choose salesforce deduplication tools in 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cloudingo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Cloudingo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cloudingo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Cloudingo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Salesforce Data Cleansing and Management Tool; Deduping and Data Quality Tool for Salesforce
- For
- Salesforce
- Price stated
- Licenses start at $2,500/year. cloudingo.com
- Starting price
- $2,500/year cloudingo.com
- Free plan or trial
- 10-Day Free Trial cloudingo.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II compliantGDPR and CCPA compliantSalesforce ISVSOC2 Type II compliant
- Hosting
- United StatesUSA
- Customers named
- Kindred HealthcareHotze1-800AccountantLucidDockerIITCatalogic
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Cloudingo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: cloudingo.com, cloudingo.com/pricing, cloudingo.com/security, cloudingo.com/features, cloudingo.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudingo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudingo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cloudingo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cloudingo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cloudingo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.