Every category where a model named Insycle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM data quality and deduplication	Revenue operations	34%	1 of 104	5%	42	endorsed leader

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Insycle yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Insycle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	1	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	2	1	0	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	4	1	0	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	4	0	1	1	6
Mistral Small	1	2	1	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	0	2	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	0	2
Kimi K2	2	1	1	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct25 labels9

Paraphrase18 labels12

Comparative27 labels10not counted in share

Budget-constrained22 labels6

Scale-constrained12 labels7

Negative18 labels6not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative122 labels in all, every segment counted; 34 of the 50 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“lighter, purpose-built tools like Cloudingo (Salesforce) or Insycle (HubSpot/Salesforce) provide safer, rule-based cleansing with better audit trails” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM data quality · negative prompt · first choice

“Easiest UI/no-code; cross-CRM sync prevention; higher G2 ratings (4.6/5, 200+ reviews) than Salesforce-only tools... Multi-CRM? Insycle.” Grok 4.1 Fast · CRM data quality · comparative prompt · first choice

“For 90% of mid-market B2B companies, Insycle represents the best balance of power, ease of use, cross-CRM capability, and cost.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM data quality · direct prompt · first choice

“Insycle and Duplicate Check both have the best balance of features and affordability for most small businesses.” MiniMax M2.5 · CRM data quality · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“These outperform pricier tools like Insycle ($100+/mo) for small budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · CRM data quality · budget prompt · soft negative

“Expensive for large databases... Steep learning curve” Kimi K2 · CRM data quality · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Insycle, over the 122 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Insycle was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DemandTools89 of 12211Not in the top three

Cloudingo61 of 1224Not in the top three

Cleanlist51 of 12214Compare →

Dedupely48 of 1228Not in the top three

ZoomInfo Operations44 of 1224Compare →

Apollo.io30 of 1221Not in the top three

Informatica28 of 1222Not in the top three

Openprise28 of 1221Not in the top three

ZoomInfo24 of 1220Not in the top three

DataGroomr23 of 1220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Insycle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 122 answers that named Insycle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com19

cleanlist.ai16

cognism.com15

clearout.io14

findymail.com11

syncmatters.com11

integrate.io10

pipeline.zoominfo.com9

leadangel.com8

nrev.ai8

121 of the 121 domain citations in answers naming Insycle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-03-27-data-quality-tools16

clearout.io/blog/crm-data-cleaning-solutions14

g2.com/categories/data-quality/f/crm14

cognism.com/blog/data-quality-software10

integrate.io/blog/top-10-data-cleansing-tools10

findymail.com/blog/crm-data-quality9

syncmatters.com/blog/6-crm-data-quality-services-to-know9

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-05-12-best-database-cleaning-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Insycle

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Insycle; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cloudingo/Insycle 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Insycle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Insycle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at insycle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.