Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 → 22 of 87
1 category · RankedPlauti Deduplicate
23Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in CRM data quality for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business25 of 96
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 99
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 103
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
In crm data quality · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Plauti Deduplicate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM data quality and deduplication | Revenue operations | 2% | 9 of 99 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 43% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Plauti Deduplicate held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CRM data quality · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 8 of 90
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 9 of 93
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM data quality | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 9 of 99 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Plauti Deduplicate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Plauti Deduplicate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you use Salesforce: Use Plauti (Duplicate Check) if you have under 10k records (free)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM data quality · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Plauti or Cloudingo if you prioritize native Salesforce integration” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM data quality · comparative prompt · alternative
“Plauti (Duplicate Check) | Native Salesforce, good UX” Kimi K2 · CRM data quality · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Plauti Deduplicate, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plauti Deduplicate was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Plauti Deduplicate, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plauti Deduplicate was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Plauti Deduplicate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Plauti Deduplicate and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com13
dataladder.com11
pipeline.zoominfo.com10
cleanlist.ai9
appexchange.salesforce.com8
datagroomr.com6
integrate.io6
itechguides.com6
plauti.comYour site6
cognism.com5
Seventy-four of the eighty domain citations in answers naming Plauti Deduplicate came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
plauti.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Plauti Deduplicate takes 2% of first choices and Insycle takes 43%.ShowHide
Search and answers
plauti.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Plauti Deduplicate takes 2% of first choices and Insycle takes 43%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “crm data quality and deduplication tool”
2
Position for “best crm data quality and deduplication tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“plauti deduplicate”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 674 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 254 · 4 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 436
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $124 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 99 in CRM data quality
Segment leader
43%
Insycle
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on plauti.com
1,148
subdomains included
Content
191
counted in the table below
Documentation
870
Product · Integration
38 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 63 | undated | |||
| Blog | 41 | 7 | 2026-09-17 | CRM | |
| Report or ebook | 28 | 0 | 2024-01-19 | ||
| Case study | 22 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 21 | 1 | 2026-08-27 | CRM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17Five ways handle duplicates cost blog
- 2026-09-17Dynamics 365 duplicate detection limit blog
- 2026-09-15Everyone just defaulted to making duplicates how defaqto cleaned up 20 000 dynamics 365 ce accounts case study
- 2026-09-0310 30 of your dynamics 365 ce records are duplicates what that actually costs in plain numbers blog
- 2026-08-27Best plauti verify alternatives for salesforce email validation comparison
- 2026-08-17Power automate dedupe flow cost blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page plauti.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Plauti Deduplicate
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Plauti Deduplicate; a claim can dispute any of them.
Plauti 4Plauti (Duplicate Check) 1Plauti / Duplicate Check for Salesforce 1
Follow Plauti Deduplicate
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Plauti Deduplicate is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Plauti Deduplicate is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automated duplicate cleanup and merging
- For
- admins and CRM teams
- Price stated
- Records + credits plauti.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Yes. Walk through a product tour in your browser with nothing to install, or start a trial in your own org. plauti.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001GDPR alignedISO/IEC 27001
- Customers named
- Roche DiagnosticsXeroxWedgewood WeddingsRobin Hood FoundationEducation FirstDefaqtoPro JuventuteVacation Innovations
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Plauti Deduplicate's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: plauti.com, plauti.com/pricing, plauti.com/solutions/it, plauti.com/case-studies, plauti.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plauti Deduplicate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plauti Deduplicate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Plauti Deduplicate by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Plauti Deduplicate is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Plauti Deduplicate, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.