Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 68 of 72
1 category · Named, not rankedAspireIQ
8Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AspireIQ was named 3 times in Influencer, where Favikon led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business71 of 77
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market34 of 72
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise46 of 61
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In influencer · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AspireIQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer platforms | Marketing | 0% | 34 of 72 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Favikon at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AspireIQ held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Influencer · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 77 → 31 of 71
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 77 → 34 of 72 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AspireIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AspireIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Better Alternatives to Consider ... Mid-market solutions: AspireIQ, Creator.co” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Influencer · negative prompt · first choice
“For relationship-focused brand building → AspireIQ” Kimi K2 · Influencer · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“be cautious of platforms with high prices, such as AspireIQ and Klear, which start at enterprise-level budgets” Llama 4 Maverick · Influencer · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AspireIQ, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AspireIQ was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AspireIQ, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AspireIQ was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AspireIQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named AspireIQ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
influenceflow.io6
g2.com5
modash.io5
favikon.com4
guideflow.com4
influencermarketinghub.com4
toptal.com4
later.com3
archive.com2
influee.co2
Thirty-nine of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming AspireIQ came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
aspire.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AspireIQ takes 0% of first choices and Favikon takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
aspire.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AspireIQ takes 0% of first choices and Favikon takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 64,888 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,293 · 242 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,916
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 34 of 72 in influencer
Segment leader
23%
Favikon
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on aspire.io
743
subdomains included
Content
622
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
24 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 462 | undated | Influencer, CRM | ||
| Conference or event | 72 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 39 | undated | Influencer | ||
| Report or ebook | 30 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 12 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page aspire.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow AspireIQ
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AspireIQ is its own company.ShowHide
The company
AspireIQ is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Join today's top ecommerce brands on the leading influencer marketing platform. Build lasting relationships and drive ROI with influencer marketing.
- For
- ecommerce brands
- Price stated
- 0 aspire.io
- Starting price
- 0 aspire.io
- Customers named
- Veradek OutdoorFable HomeKettle & FireKulani Kini's
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What AspireIQ's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: aspire.io, aspire.io/platform-overview. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AspireIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AspireIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AspireIQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AspireIQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AspireIQ, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.