Every category where a model named Arrows for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Client onboarding platforms	Customer	2%	8 of 104	0%	13	accepted challenger
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	20 of 73	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Arrows yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Arrows across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	2	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels1

Comparative13 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Arrows if you're already on HubSpot or Salesforce — it's affordable, easy to implement, and eliminates tool switching” Kimi K2 · Client onboarding · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Team scaling with HubSpot/Salesforce → Arrows (CRM-native, self-maintaining)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales rooms · comparative prompt · first choice

“Arrows if you're strongly standardized on HubSpot ... One caveat: Arrows announced a strategic shift in August 2026” GPT-6 Luna · Client onboarding · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Pick this if you're HubSpot-native—streamlined for end-to-end journeys in one ecosystem.” Grok 4.20 · Client onboarding · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Arrows, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Arrows was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Rocketlane29 of 428Compare →

GUIDEcx26 of 425Compare →

Dock25 of 427Compare →

OnRamp17 of 422Compare →

ChurnZero9 of 420Not among the top eight

ClickUp9 of 420Compare →

Precursive8 of 420Not among the top eight

Highspot7 of 421Not among the top eight

Seismic7 of 421Not among the top eight

Monday.com7 of 420Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Arrows. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 42 answers that named Arrows and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

rocketlane.com20

aissist.io17

guidecx.com16

zite.com16

onramp.us15

dock.us13

userpilot.com13

g2.com12

arrows.toYour site11

ewebinar.com11

133 of the 144 domain citations in answers naming Arrows came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aissist.io/insights/client-onboarding-software17

rocketlane.com/blogs/customer-onboarding-tools13

userpilot.com/blog/customer-onboarding-software13

onramp.us/blog/best-client-onboarding-software12

zite.com/blog/client-onboarding-software11

ewebinar.com/blog/b2b-customer-onboarding-software10

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/customer-onboarding-software9

zite.com/blog/customer-onboarding-software9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

arrows.to is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Arrows takes 2% of first choices and Rocketlane takes 47%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “client onboarding platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best client onboarding platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 368,000 a month (“arrows”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 133,601 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,079 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 530 · 22 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 615
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

3 ads · 2 text, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2026, as Arrows Software Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 104 in client onboarding

Segment leader

47%

Rocketlane

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 42 answers
Its own site cited: in 41 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on arrows.to

164

subdomains included

Content

136

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	106	0	2026-06-11	Sales rooms, Proposals
Case study	16	undated
Comparison	9	0	2025-01-22
Report or ebook	4	2	2026-07-01
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated

Most recent

2026-07-01How to set up chatgpt for sales in 15 minutes report or ebook
2026-07-01How to set up claude for sales in 15 minutes report or ebook
2026-06-11Claude cowork for sales blog
2026-06-11Claude sales skills blog
2026-04-30Every sales tool that connects to claude 2026 blog
2026-03-13How to turn sales discovery into buyer facing content automatically blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page arrows.to exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Arrows

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Arrows is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Arrows drives consistent execution across your pipeline with agents that run your playbook, build a gameplan for every deal, and give reps a workspace to execute.
arrows.to
For: B2B sales teams with complex deals and a repeatable sales motion
arrows.to
Certifications: AICPA SOC 2GDPR compliant256-bit SSLSSO/SAMLSOC 2GDPR
Hosting: USA
Customers named: StripeFiledLumin PDFTendril HealthAcme HealthRheaplyProjectworksOutboundSync
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Arrows's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: arrows.to, arrows.to/pricing, trust.arrows.to, arrows.to/product/sales-rooms, arrows.to/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Arrows's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Arrows, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Arrows by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Arrows is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Arrows, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.