AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › OnRamp · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

OnRamp

60Judge labels
9First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Client onboarding for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 104 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 19 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of OnRamp →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In client onboarding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OnRamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Client onboarding platformsCustomer4%5 of 1040%19accepted challenger
Digital adoption and onboardingCustomer0%38 of 450%1under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 30%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OnRamp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OnRamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02103
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2001102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick02002
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K211103
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels7
Paraphrase14 labels2
Comparative15 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“making it ideal for mid-market and enterprise companies handling complex implementation processes” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Client onboarding · direct prompt · first choice
“OnRamp ⭐ Best Overall for Mid-Market” Kimi K2 · Client onboarding · direct prompt · first choice
“OnRamp if you want a CS-oriented platform focused on reusable playbooks... Its published pricing starts at $15,000” GPT-6 Luna · Client onboarding · direct prompt · alternative
“OnRamp is excellent if you prioritize streamlined, high-touch onboarding without the extras” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client onboarding · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OnRamp, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OnRamp was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Userpilot15 of 601Not among the top eight
ChurnZero14 of 600Not among the top eight
Appcues12 of 600Not among the top eight
Precursive11 of 600Not among the top eight
UserGuiding10 of 601Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OnRamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 60 answers that named OnRamp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zite.com37
rocketlane.com36
userpilot.com31
monday.com28
aissist.io27
g2.com27
onramp.usYour site27
guidde.com23
guidecx.com22
ewebinar.com17

248 of the 275 domain citations in answers naming OnRamp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

onramp.us is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OnRamp takes 4% of first choices and Rocketlane takes 47%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “client onboarding platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best client onboarding platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
14,800 a month (“onramp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
750 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 13,068 a month
Searches its site ranks for
966 · 56 in the top three
Sites linking to it
689
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
17 ads · 16 text, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as OnRamp Technology, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 13 in the year, 4 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 5 of 104 in client onboarding
Segment leader
47%
Rocketlane
First choices
9 across its categories
Named in
60 answers
Its own site cited
in 60 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on onramp.us
344
subdomains included
Content
55
counted in the table below
Documentation
279
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog3902024-12-17
Comparison7undated
Case study3undated
Webinar or virtual event3undated
Template or tool2undated
Conference or event1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page onramp.us exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow OnRamp

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

OnRamp is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
OnRamp's customer onboarding and engagement platform trusted by enterprise teams to streamline workflows, delight customers and retain revenue at scale.
For
Customer and Operation Leaders at top B2B companies
Certifications
SOC 2GDPRHIPAA
Customers named
QualiaPush OperationsAGS HealthEspresaInChargeA2ZFlosum
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What OnRamp's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: onramp.us, trust.onramp.us. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OnRamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OnRamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OnRamp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where OnRamp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name OnRamp, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at onramp.us is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.