Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 25 of 92
2 categories · Named, not rankedAIclicks
10Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AIclicks was named 6 times in AI visibility and 1 other category, where Otterly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 94
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market26 of 90
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AIclicks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 0% | 26 of 90 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Competitive intelligence tools | Marketing | 0% | 29 of 86 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38% |
Movement
Since September 2026, AIclicks held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI visibility · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 14 → 26 of 85
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 26 of 90 |
| Competitive intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 29 of 86, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AIclicks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AIclicks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your goal is to find out how competitors are being evaluated inside ChatGPT or Gemini: Use AIclicks.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Competitive intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“Well-regarded platforms with stronger methodologies include Profound, Peec AI, AIclicks, and AthenaHQ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI visibility · negative prompt · alternative
“AIclicks is a highly effective middle ground.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI visibility · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AIclicks, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AIclicks was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AIclicks, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AIclicks was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AIclicks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named AIclicks and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com7
aiclicks.ioYour site4
airops.com4
semrush.com4
business.com3
capterra.com3
cognizo.ai3
hubspot.com3
stackmatix.com3
trysight.ai3
Thirty-three of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming AIclicks came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on aiclicks.io
2,577
subdomains included
Content
151
counted in the table below
Documentation
80
Product · Integration
14 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 77 | 17 | 2026-09-24 | SEO | |
| Template or tool | 43 | 41 | 2026-09-29 | SEO | |
| Comparison | 18 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | SEO | |
| Report or ebook | 7 | 4 | 2026-09-29 | SEO | |
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2025-10-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Claude code ai seo skills report or ebook
- 2026-09-29Ai citation tracker template or tool
- 2026-09-29Ai backlink builder template or tool
- 2026-09-29Semantic validator template or tool
- 2026-09-29Free lsi keywords generator template or tool
- 2026-09-29Meta title generator template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page aiclicks.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (23); 0 name its categories the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as AIclicks
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AIclicks; a claim can dispute any of them.
AIclicks / FlowHunt 1
Follow AIclicks
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AIclicks is its own company.ShowHide
The company
AIclicks is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI search analytics, GEO optimization, and monitoring
- For
- brands
- Price stated
- Three plans: Starter at $59/month (30 prompts, 3 AI platforms), Pro at $189/month (150 prompts, 4 platforms), and Business at $499/month (300+ prompts, 6 platforms). aiclicks.io
- Starting price
- 59 aiclicks.io
- Free plan or trial
- All plans include a 3-day free trial. aiclicks.io
- Integrations claimed
- 4 aiclicks.io/pricing
- Customers named
- Myoho MarketingScrapingBeeKiwiDoc Digital SEMGrowth MarshalOtterino AgencyTingglyConnectPay
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What AIclicks's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: aiclicks.io, aiclicks.io/pricing, aiclicks.io/features/mcp, aiclicks.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AIclicks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AIclicks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AIclicks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AIclicks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AIclicks, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.