GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Admetrics · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Admetrics

7Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Admetrics was named 5 times in Attribution & MMM, where Dreamdata led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business80 of 118

under the label threshold

Mid-market36 of 124

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Admetrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Attribution and marketing mix modeling	Marketing	0%	36 of 124	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Admetrics yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Admetrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“marketed as a DTC/ecommerce solution combining server-side tracking, MTA, and MMM” Perplexity Sonar · Attribution & MMM · comparative prompt · alternative

“For ecommerce: Consider Admetrics or Northbeam (but vet carefully)” Mistral Small · Attribution & MMM · negative prompt · alternative

“It is incredibly cost-effective compared to enterprise attribution suites” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“framed more as a serious operating system than a low-cost starter tool” Perplexity Sonar · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Admetrics, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Admetrics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Triple Whale6 of 71Not in the top three

Google Analytics 45 of 73Not in the top three

Cometly5 of 70Not in the top three

Ruler Analytics5 of 70Not in the top three

SegmentStream5 of 70Not in the top three

Dreamdata4 of 71Not in the top three

Northbeam4 of 70Not in the top three

Google Meridian3 of 71Not in the top three

HubSpot Marketing Hub3 of 71Not in the top three

HockeyStack3 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Admetrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 7 answers that named Admetrics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

admetrics.ioYour site4

cometly.com4

hockeystack.com4

learn.g2.com4

segmentstream.com4

thecmo.com4

funnel.io3

gartner.com3

improvado.io3

mcpanalytics.ai3

Thirty-two of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Admetrics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

admetrics.io/compare/10-best-marketing-attribution-tools4

hockeystack.com/blog-posts/best-marketing-attribution-software4

learn.g2.com/best-attribution-software4

segmentstream.com/blog/articles/best-attribution-tools4

thecmo.com/tools/best-marketing-attribution-software4

cometly.com/post/marketing-attribution-platforms-comparison3

funnel.io/blog/top-mta-tools3

gartner.com/reviews/market/b2b-multitouch-attribution-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Admetrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Admetrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at admetrics.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.