Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 76 → 20 of 108
1 category · RankedAdmetrics
21Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Attribution & MMM for small business buyers
Rank 27 of 123 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business21 of 112
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market27 of 123
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise89 of 110
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Admetrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 0% | 27 of 123 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Admetrics held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Attribution & MMM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 36 → 29 of 112
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 92 of 101, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attribution & MMM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 27 of 123 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Admetrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Admetrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Admetrics is positioned as "Best for: mid-market brands that want MMM-grade forecasting without hiring a data scientist"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Attribution & MMM · direct prompt · alternative
“A great choice if you find existing attribution data confusing and need a clearer view of profitability per channel.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · alternative
“It is one of the most cost-effective ways for smaller e-commerce stores to get actual cookieless MMM insights.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · alternative
“Both tactical and strategic measurement | A hybrid platform (Northbeam with MMM+, Admetrics)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Attribution & MMM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Admetrics ($399+/mo) add up fast without proven scale.” Grok 4.20 · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Admetrics, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Admetrics was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Admetrics, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Admetrics was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Admetrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Admetrics and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
admetrics.ioYour site21
cometly.com18
improvado.io15
mcpanalytics.ai11
guideflow.com10
segmentstream.com10
ruleranalytics.com8
thecmo.com7
usermaven.com7
aidigital.com5
Ninety-one of the 112 domain citations in answers naming Admetrics came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
admetrics.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Admetrics takes 0% of first choices and Dreamdata takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
admetrics.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Admetrics takes 0% of first choices and Dreamdata takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“admetrics”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,736 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,184 · 53 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,582
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 123 in Attribution & MMM
Segment leader
27%
Dreamdata
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on admetrics.io
1,305
subdomains included
Content
1,170
counted in the table below
Documentation
100
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,015 | undated | SEO, Social media | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 54 | undated | SEO, Social media | ||
| Report or ebook | 38 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 32 | 18 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 19 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 8 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | 2 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated | SEO |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Best marketing analytics tools software comparison
- 2026-09-18Best marketing intelligence tools software comparison
- 2026-09-18Best marketing mix modeling tools software comparison
- 2026-09-17Best marketing dashboards and reporting tools comparison
- 2026-09-16Best funnel analysis tools software comparison
- 2026-08-18Admetrics vs hyros comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page admetrics.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (34); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Admetrics
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Admetrics; a claim can dispute any of them.
AdMetrics 1
Follow Admetrics
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Admetrics is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Admetrics is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Mission control for e-commerce. Know what earns. Move the budget. Admetrics connects your shop and ad accounts, shows what every campaign really earns after costs, and moves budgets toward what works. Manually or on autopilot.
- For
- e-commerce brands
- Price stated
- One hour setup. 21 days free. Cancel any time. admetrics.io
- Starting price
- 339 admetrics.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 21 days free admetrics.io
- Integrations claimed
- 30 admetrics.io
- Certifications
- GDPR complianceCertified Admetrics partner for finance professionals
- Hosting
- EUEU servers & residency
- Customers named
- ESNMore NutritionOlivenzauberFreiluftkindTales & TailsNaturtreuHeimplanetNyfter
What Admetrics's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: admetrics.io, admetrics.io/pricing, admetrics.io/customers, admetrics.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Admetrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Admetrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Admetrics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Admetrics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Admetrics, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.