GTM AI Index
Index Sales Sales coaching › Chorus by ZoomInfo vs Fathom
Sales coaching and training · September 2026 Edition

Chorus by ZoomInfo vs Fathom

Zero of twelve models named Chorus by ZoomInfo first on the direct prompt; zero named Fathom. Chorus by ZoomInfo was named by eleven of the twelve models and Fathom by eight and Chorus by ZoomInfo carries 26 labels and Fathom 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Chorus by ZoomInfo

accepted challenger

By ZoomInfo, Vancouver, Washington, United States, founded 2000. Named in six categories this edition.

Fathom

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate15%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2612A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Chorus by ZoomInfo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SalesHood was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. SalesHood vs Chorus by ZoomInfo · SalesHood vs Fathom · Gong vs Chorus by ZoomInfo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales coaching and training page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Chorus by ZoomInfoFirst choices, of twelve modelsFathom
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative10
Budget-constrained02
Scale-constrained20
Negative004 against Chorus by ZoomInfo · 1 against Fathom
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Chorus by ZoomInfo and Fathom were named in the same answer seventy-three times, of the 229 answers naming Chorus by ZoomInfo and the 150 naming Fathom. In those answers Fathom took the first choice twenty-three times and Chorus by ZoomInfo one.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Chorus by ZoomInfo and Fathom stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Chorus by ZoomInfo Fathom first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Chorus by ZoomInfo on the left and Fathom on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Chorus by ZoomInfo and Fathom stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Avoma alternatives: Challenger, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Gong, MindTickle
Gemini 3.5 FlashAvoma, SalesHood alternatives: Allego, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Jiminny, PitchMonster, Second Nature
Kimi K2SalesHood alternatives: 360Learning, Allego, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot

Neither was named

9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniMindTickle alternatives: Allego, Gong, SalesHood, Second Nature
Perplexity SonarMindTickle alternatives: Gong, Highspot, Jiminny, SalesHood
Grok 4.1 FastSalesHood alternatives: Allego, Gong, MindTickle
Mistral SmallSalesHood alternatives: Convo, Dock, Spekit
DeepSeek V4 FlashSalesHood alternatives: Avoma, Salesloft
Llama 4 MaverickRichardson Sales Performance, Sandler Training alternatives: Convo, Dock, SalesHood, Spekit
Qwen 3.7 FlashGong alternatives: Clari Copilot, HubSpot Sales Hub, SalesHood, Spekit
GLM 4.7 FlashXSalesHood alternatives: Allego, Learn:Up
MiniMax M2.5PitchMonster alternatives: 360Learning, Gong, SalesHood, Salesloft

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Fathom leads by thirteen points.
Fathom13%#2 of 18
Chorus by ZoomInfo0%#15 of 18
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Chorus by ZoomInfo4%#5 of 17
Fathom4%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Chorus by ZoomInfo0%#12 of 12
Fathom0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Chorus by ZoomInfo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Expensive, enterprise-only pricing with lock-in contracts and quality issues that have led many teams to switch to Gong.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Post-call conversation analysis (enterprise B2B) | Chorus (ZoomInfo), Gong” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“Real-time call coaching + deal intelligence | Gong or Chorus” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“post-call analysis → Gong/Chorus; readiness → Mindtickle” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fathom

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“AI-generated meeting summaries are sometimes criticized for missing critical context or nuance” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.