Two of twelve models named MindTickle first on the direct prompt; zero named Chorus by ZoomInfo. MindTickle was named by twelve of the twelve models and Chorus by ZoomInfo by eleven and MindTickle carries 47 labels and Chorus by ZoomInfo 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
By ZoomInfo, Vancouver, Washington, United States, founded 2000. Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales coaching and training page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, MindTickle and Chorus by ZoomInfo were named in the same answer sixty times, of the 316 answers naming MindTickle and the 229 naming Chorus by ZoomInfo. In those answers Chorus by ZoomInfo took the first choice three times and MindTickle eleven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“giants like Gong, Mindtickle, or Seismic (which often require multi-thousand dollar annual commitments and hefty implementation fees) are out of the question” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid trying to buy a full "Sales Enablement Platform" like Seismic or Mindtickle immediately” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like Gong/Mindtickle ($50-150+/user/mo) unless scaling.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Mindtickle is a more “all-in-one” revenue enablement platform with coaching, training, role-play, analytics, and readiness tracking in one place.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“Mindtickle: Exceptional for structured onboarding, AI role-playing ... and connecting training to live deal coaching.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Expensive, enterprise-only pricing with lock-in contracts and quality issues that have led many teams to switch to Gong.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Post-call conversation analysis (enterprise B2B) | Chorus (ZoomInfo), Gong” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“Real-time call coaching + deal intelligence | Gong or Chorus” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“post-call analysis → Gong/Chorus; readiness → Mindtickle” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.