AiSDR vs Reply.io
Zero of twelve models named AiSDR first on the direct prompt; one named Reply.io. AiSDR was named by twelve of the twelve models and Reply.io by eleven and AiSDR carries 37 labels and Reply.io 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By AiSDR Inc., San Francisco, United States, founded 2023. Named in one category this edition.
San Jose, United States, founded 2014. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.
By framing
AiSDRFirst choices, of twelve modelsReply.io
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, AiSDR and Reply.io were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 99 answers naming AiSDR and the 94 naming Reply.io. In those answers Reply.io took the first choice one time and AiSDR eight.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
AiSDR Reply.io first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, AiSDR on the left and Reply.io on the right.The direct prompt
Reply.io first, AiSDR an alternative
1 of 12 modelsAiSDR was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
AiSDR2%#5 of 11Reply.io2%#6 of 11What the models said about AiSDR
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“AiSDR - Platform compliance issues, quality degradation at scale” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“AiSDR has significant control and flexibility limitations at a premium price point, with concerning hallucination rates.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most teams should start with Tier 1 or 2 before jumping to Tier 3 autonomous agents.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“AiSDR | Only major vendor with quarterly contracts ($900/mo), transparent pricing, lower commitment risk” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Go with AiSDR for a hands-off, autonomous experience at mid-tier pricing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“🏆 Best Overall Value: AiSDR” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Reply.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“though the cited evaluation ranks it far below the leaders on total capability” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · soft negative
“Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Start with Reply.io (Jason AI) or Amplemarket Duo for mid-market B2B.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Reply.io's paid plans start at $59/month for email sequences with Jason AI available on higher tiers, making it the most accessible entry point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.