GTM AI Index
Index Sales AI SDR › Artisan vs AiSDR
AI SDR agents · September 2026 Edition

Artisan vs AiSDR

Two of twelve models named Artisan first on the direct prompt; zero named AiSDR. Both were named by all twelve models and Artisan carries 36 labels and AiSDR 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Artisan

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

AiSDR

accepted challenger

By AiSDR Inc., San Francisco, United States, founded 2023. Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share13%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate42%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels3637A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Artisan reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Reply.io was named alongside these two in seven of the twelve direct answers. Apollo.io vs Artisan · Apollo.io vs AiSDR · Artisan vs Amplemarket

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ArtisanFirst choices, of twelve modelsAiSDR
Direct203 against Artisan
Paraphrase40
Comparative11
Budget-constrained014 against Artisan · 1 against AiSDR
Scale-constrained002 against Artisan · 1 against AiSDR
Negative016 against Artisan · 2 against AiSDR
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Artisan and AiSDR were named in the same answer sixty-three times, of the 102 answers naming Artisan and the 99 naming AiSDR. In those answers AiSDR took the first choice fourteen times and Artisan seven.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Artisan and AiSDR stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Artisan AiSDR first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Artisan on the left and AiSDR on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Artisan and AiSDR stood in it.

Artisan first, AiSDR an alternative

2 of 12 modelsAiSDR was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashArtisan alternatives: Clay, Regie.ai, Reply.io
GLM 4.7 FlashXArtisan alternatives: 11x, AiSDR, Regie.ai, Salesforge

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarAmplemarket Duo alternatives: AiSDR, Artisan Ava
Mistral SmallAmplemarket Duo Copilot alternatives: AiSDR, Artisan, Salesforge
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmplemarket alternatives: 11x, AiSDR, Artisan, Reply.io
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmplemarket alternatives: AiSDR, Reply.io
Kimi K2Amplemarket, Reply.io alternatives: AiSDR
MiniMax M2.5Amplemarket, SalesTools.io alternatives: Agent Frank, AiSDR, Reply.io

Neither was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5RocketSDR alternatives: Apollo.io
GPT-5.4 miniQualified alternatives: Reply.io
Grok 4.1 FastApollo.io alternatives: Amplemarket, Reply.io
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
AiSDR leads by twenty-two points.
AiSDR22%#2 of 8
Artisan0%#7 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Artisan leads at mid-market.
Artisan13%#2 of 11
AiSDR2%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: AiSDR leads at enterprise.
AiSDR13%#2 of 11
Artisan7%#6 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Artisan

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid fully autonomous AI SDRs with annual lock-in contracts, no trials, and documented quality problems (Artisan, 11x.ai especially)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Artisan - LinkedIn restricted their automated outreach in early 2026... G2 rating of 3.8/5 (lowest among reviewed platforms)” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Artisan was temporarily banned by LinkedIn in late 2025/early 2026 due to platform compliance and data-scraping violations.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“unless your team specifically wants an AI SDR that books meetings more autonomously, in which case Artisan is the better fit” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Artisan"s AI agent, Ava, is highly regarded for mid-market companies that want a fully autonomous out-of-the-box solution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“or Artisan/Ava if you want more autonomous outbound prospecting with built-in contact data.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about AiSDR

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“AiSDR - Platform compliance issues, quality degradation at scale” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“AiSDR has significant control and flexibility limitations at a premium price point, with concerning hallucination rates.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most teams should start with Tier 1 or 2 before jumping to Tier 3 autonomous agents.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“AiSDR | Only major vendor with quarterly contracts ($900/mo), transparent pricing, lower commitment risk” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Go with AiSDR for a hands-off, autonomous experience at mid-tier pricing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“🏆 Best Overall Value: AiSDR” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.