GTM AI Index
Index Sales AI SDR › Salesforge vs Reply.io
AI SDR agents · September 2026 Edition

Salesforge vs Reply.io

Zero of twelve models named Salesforge first on the direct prompt; one named Reply.io. Salesforge was named by five of the twelve models and Reply.io by eleven and Salesforge carries 11 labels and Reply.io 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Salesforge

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Reply.io

accepted challenger

San Jose, United States, founded 2014. Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate18%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1118A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Salesforge reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.AiSDR was named alongside these two in seven of the twelve direct answers. Apollo.io vs Salesforge · Apollo.io vs Reply.io · Artisan vs Salesforge

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SalesforgeFirst choices, of twelve modelsReply.io
Direct011 against Salesforge · 1 against Reply.io
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Salesforge
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Salesforge and Reply.io stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Salesforge Reply.io first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Salesforge on the left and Reply.io on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Salesforge and Reply.io stood in it.

Reply.io first, Salesforge not the choice

1 of 12 modelsSalesforge was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2Amplemarket, Reply.io alternatives: AiSDR

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniQualified alternatives: Reply.io
Gemini 3.5 FlashArtisan alternatives: Clay, Regie.ai, Reply.io
Grok 4.1 FastApollo.io alternatives: Amplemarket, Reply.io
Mistral SmallAmplemarket Duo Copilot alternatives: AiSDR, Artisan, Salesforge
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmplemarket alternatives: 11x, AiSDR, Artisan, Reply.io
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmplemarket alternatives: AiSDR, Reply.io
GLM 4.7 FlashXArtisan alternatives: 11x, AiSDR, Regie.ai, Salesforge
MiniMax M2.5Amplemarket, SalesTools.io alternatives: Agent Frank, AiSDR, Reply.io

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5RocketSDR alternatives: Apollo.io
Perplexity SonarAmplemarket Duo alternatives: AiSDR, Artisan Ava
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Salesforge leads by two points.
Salesforge2%#– of 8
Reply.io0%#6 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Salesforge leads by two points.
Salesforge4%#4 of 11
Reply.io2%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Reply.io leads at enterprise.
Reply.io2%#– of 11
Salesforge0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Salesforge

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Approval-first workflow slows velocity” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Caution for Specific Use Cases” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Salesforge (Agent Frank) — Best All-in-One AI SDR” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Salesforge (Agent Frank) - *Best Overall*” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For budget-conscious scaling: Salesforge (Agent Frank) at $499/month provides excellent value” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative

What the models said about Reply.io

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“though the cited evaluation ranks it far below the leaders on total capability” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · soft negative
“Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Start with Reply.io (Jason AI) or Amplemarket Duo for mid-market B2B.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Reply.io's paid plans start at $59/month for email sequences with Jason AI available on higher tiers, making it the most accessible entry point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.