GTM AI Index
Index › Sales › AI SDR › Salesforge vs Agent Frank
AI SDR agents · September 2026 Edition

Salesforge vs Agent Frank

Zero of twelve models named Salesforge first on the direct prompt; zero named Agent Frank. Salesforge was named by five of the twelve models and Agent Frank by eight and Salesforge carries 11 labels and Agent Frank 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Salesforge

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Agent Frank

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate18%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1110A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Salesforge reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Reply.io was named alongside these two in seven of the twelve direct answers. Apollo.io vs Salesforge · Apollo.io vs Agent Frank · Artisan vs Salesforge

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SalesforgeFirst choices, of twelve modelsAgent Frank
Direct001 against Salesforge
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Salesforge
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Salesforge and Agent Frank stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Salesforge Agent Frank first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Salesforge on the left and Agent Frank on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Salesforge and Agent Frank stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallAmplemarket Duo Copilot alternatives: AiSDR, Artisan, Salesforge
GLM 4.7 FlashXArtisan alternatives: 11x, AiSDR, Regie.ai, Salesforge
MiniMax M2.5Amplemarket, SalesTools.io alternatives: Agent Frank, AiSDR, Reply.io

Neither was named

9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5RocketSDR alternatives: Apollo.io
GPT-5.4 miniQualified alternatives: Reply.io
Gemini 3.5 FlashArtisan alternatives: Clay, Regie.ai, Reply.io
Perplexity SonarAmplemarket Duo alternatives: AiSDR, Artisan Ava
Grok 4.1 FastApollo.io alternatives: Amplemarket, Reply.io
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmplemarket alternatives: 11x, AiSDR, Artisan, Reply.io
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmplemarket alternatives: AiSDR, Reply.io
Kimi K2Amplemarket, Reply.io alternatives: AiSDR

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Agent Frank leads by seven points.
Agent Frank9%#3 of 8
Salesforge2%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Salesforge leads at mid-market.
Salesforge4%#4 of 11
Agent Frank2%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Agent Frank is not named for this buyer.
Salesforge0%#– of 11
Agent Frank—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Salesforge

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Approval-first workflow slows velocity” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Caution for Specific Use Cases” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Salesforge (Agent Frank) — Best All-in-One AI SDR” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Salesforge (Agent Frank) - *Best Overall*” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For budget-conscious scaling: Salesforge (Agent Frank) at $499/month provides excellent value” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative

What the models said about Agent Frank

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Top Pick: Agent Frank (Salesforge) - $499/month” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want a highly scalable, fully autonomous email worker: Go with Agent Frank at $499/month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
“Agent Frank at $416/mo (on annual billing) is the cheapest turnkey solution with proven ROI” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Apollo.io vs SalesforgeApollo.io vs Agent FrankArtisan vs SalesforgeArtisan vs Agent FrankAmplemarket vs SalesforgeAmplemarket vs Agent FrankSalesforge vs AiSDRSalesforge vs Reply.ioSalesforge vs QualifiedAiSDR vs Agent FrankReply.io vs Agent FrankAgent Frank vs QualifiedAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full AI SDR standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.