Index › Sales › AI SDR › Amplemarket vs Salesforge

AI SDR agents · September 2026 Edition

Amplemarket vs Salesforge

Four of twelve models named Amplemarket first on the direct prompt; zero named Salesforge. Amplemarket was named by nine of the twelve models and Salesforge by five and Amplemarket carries 17 labels and Salesforge 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Amplemarket

accepted challenger

United States. Named in five categories this edition.

Salesforge

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share11%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate0%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.

Labels1711A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Amplemarket reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Reply.io was named alongside these two in seven of the twelve direct answers. Apollo.io vs Amplemarket · Apollo.io vs Salesforge · Artisan vs Amplemarket

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

AmplemarketFirst choices, of twelve modelsSalesforge

Direct401 against Salesforge

Paraphrase12

Comparative20

Budget-constrained00

Scale-constrained00

Negative101 against Salesforge

Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Amplemarket and Salesforge stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5

Amplemarket

Salesforge

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Amplemarket on the left and Salesforge on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Amplemarket and Salesforge stood in it.

Amplemarket first, Salesforge not the choice

4 of 12 modelsSalesforge was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

DeepSeek V4 FlashAmplemarket alternatives: 11x, AiSDR, Artisan, Reply.io

Qwen 3.7 FlashAmplemarket alternatives: AiSDR, Reply.io

Kimi K2Amplemarket, Reply.io alternatives: AiSDR

MiniMax M2.5Amplemarket, SalesTools.io alternatives: Agent Frank, AiSDR, Reply.io

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Grok 4.1 FastApollo.io alternatives: Amplemarket, Reply.io

Mistral SmallAmplemarket Duo Copilot alternatives: AiSDR, Artisan, Salesforge

GLM 4.7 FlashXArtisan alternatives: 11x, AiSDR, Regie.ai, Salesforge

Neither was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

Claude Haiku 4.5RocketSDR alternatives: Apollo.io

GPT-5.4 miniQualified alternatives: Reply.io

Gemini 3.5 FlashArtisan alternatives: Clay, Regie.ai, Reply.io

Perplexity SonarAmplemarket Duo alternatives: AiSDR, Artisan Ava

Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Level: the same share of first choices.

Amplemarket#– of 8

Salesforge#– of 8

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Amplemarket leads by seven points.

Amplemarket#3 of 11

Salesforge#4 of 11

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Amplemarket leads by four points.

Amplemarket#7 of 11

Salesforge#– of 11

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Amplemarket

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Amplemarket if you want stronger signal intelligence and multi-channel (phone + LinkedIn) capabilities” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Salesforge

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Approval-first workflow slows velocity” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative

“Caution for Specific Use Cases” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative

“Salesforge (Agent Frank) — Best All-in-One AI SDR” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“1. Salesforge (Agent Frank) - *Best Overall*” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“For budget-conscious scaling: Salesforge (Agent Frank) at $499/month provides excellent value” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative

Also compared

Apollo.io vs Amplemarket Apollo.io vs Salesforge Artisan vs Amplemarket Artisan vs Salesforge Amplemarket vs AiSDR Amplemarket vs Reply.io Amplemarket vs Agent Frank Amplemarket vs Qualified Salesforge vs AiSDR Salesforge vs Reply.io Salesforge vs Agent Frank Salesforge vs Qualified All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full AI SDR standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.