Reply.io vs Qualified
One of twelve models named Reply.io first on the direct prompt; one named Qualified. Reply.io was named by eleven of the twelve models and Qualified by nine and Reply.io carries 18 labels and Qualified 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Jose, United States, founded 2014. Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.
By framing
Reply.ioFirst choices, of twelve modelsQualified
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Reply.io Qualified first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Reply.io on the left and Qualified on the right.The direct prompt
Reply.io first, Qualified not the choice
1 of 12 modelsQualified was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qualified first, Reply.io an alternative
1 of 12 modelsReply.io was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Reply.io0%#6 of 8Qualified0%#– of 8Reply.io2%#6 of 11Qualified2%#8 of 11Reply.io2%#– of 11Qualified2%#8 of 11What the models said about Reply.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“though the cited evaluation ranks it far below the leaders on total capability” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · soft negative
“Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Start with Reply.io (Jason AI) or Amplemarket Duo for mid-market B2B.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Reply.io's paid plans start at $59/month for email sequences with Jason AI available on higher tiers, making it the most accessible entry point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
What the models said about Qualified
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“enterprise options like 11x ($3,750+/mo) or Qualified ($40K+/yr)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“the safest "best overall" choice is usually Qualified” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Excellent for inbound conversion; 4.9/5 G2 rating from 1,547 reviews; strong support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
“Inbound website conversational SDR, commonly used to convert traffic into meetings.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.