QuotaPath vs Maptive
One of twelve models named QuotaPath first on the direct prompt; zero named Maptive. QuotaPath was named by eight of the twelve models and Maptive by eleven and QuotaPath carries 23 labels and Maptive 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the territory and quota planning page.
By framing
QuotaPathFirst choices, of twelve modelsMaptive
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
QuotaPath Maptive first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, QuotaPath on the left and Maptive on the right.The direct prompt
QuotaPath first, Maptive not the choice
1 of 12 modelsMaptive was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
QuotaPath22%#1 of 13Maptive4%#4 of 13What the models said about QuotaPath
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Accessible pricing (~$35/user/mo) ... but light on territory design/capacity modeling.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Fullcast (if Salesforce-native) or QuotaPath (for best value and flexibility) would be the strongest choices” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend QuotaPath or CaptivateIQ for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Maptive
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Mapping-first tools with algorithmic territory balancing at lower cost, but no quota or capacity planning” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Maptive is best for teams that want every mapping feature included at a flat per-user price” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“"We just need to draw clean maps and visualize coverage" → eSpatial, Maptive, or Salesforce Maps” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
“eSpatial, Maptive | Excellent for algorithmic balancing and deep GIS visualization.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.