GTM AI Index
Index Revenue operations Territory planning › CaptivateIQ vs QuotaPath
Territory and quota planning · September 2026 Edition

CaptivateIQ vs QuotaPath

Three of twelve models named CaptivateIQ first on the direct prompt; one named QuotaPath. CaptivateIQ was named by twelve of the twelve models and QuotaPath by eight and CaptivateIQ carries 44 labels and QuotaPath 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

CaptivateIQ

endorsed leader

Named in three categories this edition.

QuotaPath

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share30%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4423A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CaptivateIQ reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Fullcast was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. CaptivateIQ vs Fullcast · Fullcast vs QuotaPath

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the territory and quota planning page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CaptivateIQFirst choices, of twelve modelsQuotaPath
Direct311 against QuotaPath
Paraphrase91
Comparative40
Budget-constrained002 against CaptivateIQ
Scale-constrained30
Negative102 against CaptivateIQ
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CaptivateIQ and QuotaPath stood in it.

CaptivateIQ first, QuotaPath not the choice

3 of 12 modelsQuotaPath was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastCaptivateIQ alternatives: Everstage, Fullcast, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning, eSpatial
Qwen 3.7 FlashCaptivateIQ alternatives: SalesRabbit, Territory Helper
MiniMax M2.5CaptivateIQ alternatives: Fullcast, SalesRabbit, Varicent

QuotaPath first, CaptivateIQ not the choice

1 of 12 modelsCaptivateIQ was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallFullcast, QuotaPath alternatives: Anaplan Territory & Quota Planning, Everstage, Varicent

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashFullcast alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Pigment, QuotaPath, Salesforce Maps, Salesforce Sales Planning
Perplexity SonarFullcast alternatives: CaptivateIQ
DeepSeek V4 FlashFullcast alternatives: CaptivateIQ, Salesforce Sales Planning + Territory Management
Kimi K2Fullcast, Pigment alternatives: CaptivateIQ

Neither was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5CaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Clari Align, Fullcast, eSpatial
GPT-5.4 miniCaptivateIQ Planning alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning, Xactly
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GLM 4.7 FlashXFullcast alternatives: Salesforce Sales Planning / Territory Planning Add-On, Vena

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
QuotaPath leads by sixteen points.
QuotaPath22%#1 of 13
CaptivateIQ6%#3 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: CaptivateIQ leads at mid-market.
CaptivateIQ30%#1 of 11
QuotaPath4%#3 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
CaptivateIQ leads by two points.
CaptivateIQ4%#5 of 10
QuotaPath2%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about CaptivateIQ

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Mid-market RevOps tools (~$20K+/year or $2,400+/user/year).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“End-to-End Revenue Plan | CaptivateIQ, Forma.ai | Combines territory carving, quota setting, and variable comp in a single agile platform.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“CaptivateIQ is widely considered the strongest option for mid-market teams because it eliminates the need for multiple disconnected tools.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about QuotaPath

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Accessible pricing (~$35/user/mo) ... but light on territory design/capacity modeling.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Fullcast (if Salesforce-native) or QuotaPath (for best value and flexibility) would be the strongest choices” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend QuotaPath or CaptivateIQ for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.