Product information management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “product information management system”, and as “PIM for product catalog data”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · Akeneo PIM 25%
27Inriver PIM25Akeneo PIM21Pimcore27others
27% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Inriver PIM27%
Inriver PIM27%02Akeneo PIM25%
Akeneo PIM25%03Pimcore21%
Pimcore21%04Stibo Systems STEP12%
Stibo Systems STEP12%05Salsify6%
Salsify6%06Informatica Product 3604%
Informatica Product 3604%07Plytix4%
Plytix4%08Syndigo0%
Syndigo0%09Sales Layer0%
Sales Layer0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Akeneo PIM23%
15 of 66 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... **Akeneo Enterprise**, **inRiver**, and **Salsify** use **per-user pricing models**” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
Salsify22%
11 of 51 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“usually steer clear of Salsify, inRiver, Syndigo, Stibo Systems etc., which are quote-only enterprise peers” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
Inriver PIM18%
10 of 56 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“What to Avoid ... **Akeneo Enterprise**, **inRiver**, and **Salsify** use **per-user pricing models**” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
Pimcore15%
8 of 54 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“relying on their free, self-hosted Community Editions is highly discouraged for large enterprises” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1091 links across 217 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Inriver55 answers · 126 citations · 14 models
vendor site · AtroPIM51 answers · 121 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Plytix34 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Pimcore29 answers · 43 citations · 13 models
20 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Bluestone PIM18 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Gartner17 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · checkthat.ai17 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Akeneo17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Pimly17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
32 answers · 12 models
25 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 8 models
25 answers · 12 models
24 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best product information management system”, “product information management system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inriver PIM inriver.com | 27% | 108 | 210 | 4 | 5,120 | 13 | ||
| Akeneo PIM akeneo.com Akeneo PIM 25%, Akeneo Product Cloud 0% | 25% | 159 | 480 | 15 | 33,435 | 13 | 5 | |
| Pimcore pimcore.com | 21% | 137 | 880 | 22 | 4,825 | 0 | 2 | |
| Stibo Systems STEP stibosystems.com | 12% | 53 | 170 | 3 | 16,043 | $466 | 8 | |
| Salsify salsify.com | 6% | 90 | 18,100 | 817 | 70,138 | 14 | 9 | |
| Informatica informatica.com Informatica Product 360 4% | 4% | 24 | 14,800 | 1,414 | 73,321 company | 120 | 7 | |
| Plytix plytix.com | 4% | 133 | 720 | 12 | 6,008 | 13 | 5 | |
| Bluestone PIM bluestonepim.com | 2% | 13 | ||||||
| Syndigo syndigo.com | 0% | 43 | 4,400 | 163 | 35,614 | $23 | 28 | |
| Contentserv | 0% |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 12 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akeneo.com, gartner.com, pimcore.com, plytix.com). The first result for “best product information management system” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best product information management system for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which PIM for product catalog data would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade product information management systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best product information management system for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a product information management system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which product information management systems should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceAkeneo PIMChangedno first choiceBluestone PIMagainst: Pimberlyno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Salsify PXM
Three alternatives
Pimcore, Salsify, SyndigoTwo alternatives
Akeneo PIM, PimcoreGPT-5.4 miniInriver PIMStibo Systems STEPChangedStibo Systems STEPPimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, Syndigono first choiceagainst: Pimcore
Three alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, Stibo Systems STEPOne alternative
Akeneo Product CloudSix alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Contentserv, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, SyndigoOne alternative
Agility PIMGemini 3.5 FlashStibo Systems STEPInriver PIMChangedAkeneo PIMPimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, SalsifyAkeneo PIMagainst: Adobe Commerce (Magento) product management, Akeneo Community Edition, Catsy, KatanaPIM, Oracle Product Hub, Pimcore, Plytix, SAP Commerce Cloud, Sales Layer, Salesforce Commerce Cloud catalogs, Shopify's native product catalog, Stibo Systems STEP
Five alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, SyndigoFour alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPFive alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoTwo alternatives
AtroPIM, PlytixFour alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, SyndigoPerplexity SonarAkeneo PIM, Inriver PIMInriver PIMChangedno first choiceAkeneo PIMagainst: Pimcore, Plytixno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Pimcore, Sales LayerTwo alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Stibo Systems STEPOne alternative
Bluestone PIMGrok 4.1 FastAkeneo PIM, SalsifyStibo Systems STEPChangedagainst: Pimcoreno first choiceagainst: Perfion, SAP Master Data GovernancePimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo, Syndigono first choiceagainst: Bluestone PIM, Contentserv, Salsify
Two alternatives
Inriver PIM, PimcoreThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIMTwo alternatives
AtroPIM, PlytixMistral SmallInformatica Product 360, PimcoreAkeneo PIM, SalsifyChangedInformatica Product 360, Stibo Systems STEPPimcoreagainst: Salsify, Syndigono first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Plytix
Two alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Sales LayerOne alternative
Inriver PIMThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, SalsifyOne alternative
Akeneo PIMDeepSeek V4 FlashPimcoreStibo Systems STEPChangedno first choicePimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Bluestone PIM, SalsifyInriver PIMagainst: Pimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Oracle, Pimcore, SAP Master Data Governance, Salesforce
Three alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPTwo alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIMOne alternative
PlytixTwo alternatives
Akeneo PIM, SalsifyLlama 4 MaverickInformatica Product 360no first choiceChangedno first choiceAkeneo PIMno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Pimcore, PlytixTwo alternatives
Sales Layer, Stibo Systems STEPQwen 3.7 FlashSalsifyAkeneo PIMChangedSalsifyPimcoreno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP
Four alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Pimcore, SAP Commerce CloudThree alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore, SalsifyFour alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Contentserv, Inriver PIM, PimcoreTwo alternatives
Akeneo PIM, SalsifyKimi K2Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIMInriver PIM, Stibo Systems STEPChangedInriver PIMPimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Plytix, Salsify, Syndigono first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Catsy, Plytix, Sales Layer
Three alternatives
Pimcore, Sales Layer, SalsifyTwo alternatives
Akeneo PIM, SyndigoSix alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoOne alternative
PIMintoGLM 4.7 FlashXInriver PIMInriver PIMHeldSalsifyPlytixagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Salsifyno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimberly, Pimly, SalsifyThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, Stibo Systems STEPFour alternatives
Contentserv, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Stibo Systems STEPTwo alternatives
Pimberly, PimcoreMiniMax M2.5Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIMAkeneo PIM, Inriver PIMHeldInformatica Product 360Pimcoreagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Salsifyno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Pimcore, SAP Hybris, Salesforce Commerce CloudThree alternatives
EnterWorks, SAP Commerce Cloud, Stibo Systems STEPFour alternatives
Akeneo Product Cloud, Inriver PIM, SAP PIM, Stibo Systems STEPTwo alternatives
PIMinto, PlytixGPT-6 LunaAkeneo PIM, Inriver PIMStibo Systems STEPChangedno first choicePimcoreno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIMagainst: Pimcore
One alternative
Stibo Systems STEPThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, SalsifyEight alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Centric PXM, Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify PXM, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoOne alternative
Inriver PIMMuse Glimmer 30BAkeneo PIM, Inriver PIMInriver PIMChangedInformatica Product 360Plytixagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, Syndigono first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Ergonode, Inriver PIM, OneTimePIM, Pimcore open core, Plytix, Sales Layer, Salsify PXM
Two alternatives
Informatica MDM – Product 360, PimcoreThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, SalsifySix alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, SAP Commerce Cloud PIM, Salsify, Stibo Systems Product Experience Data CloudThree alternatives
Pimberly, Pimcore, Struct PIMBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:25 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:47 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:31 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:37 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:18 | yes | 24 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:51 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:40 | yes | 16 | 131 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:03 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:37 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:37 | yes | 12 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:02 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:44 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:25 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:25 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:55 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:22 | yes | 20 | 50 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:10 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 16 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:29 | yes | 22 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:58 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:30 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:37 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:28 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:04 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:37 | yes | 22 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:34 | yes | 11 | 13 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:29 | yes | 21 | 48 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:17 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:57 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:33 | yes | 24 | 196 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:52 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 12 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:38 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:05 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:16 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:28 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:16 | yes | 14 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:12 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:59 | yes | 19 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 16 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:13 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:42 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:12 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:30 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:17 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:09 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 21 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:32 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:34 | yes | 23 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:43 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:32 | yes | 18 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:24 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:45 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:57 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:32 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:17 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:32 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:24 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:34 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:39 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:53 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:41 | yes | 8 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:48 | yes | 15 | 58 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:03 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:08 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 22:55 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:06 | yes | 2 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:16 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akeneo read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo (Enterprise Edition) read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo (Enterprise) read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo (Product Cloud) read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo Enterprise read as Akeneo PIM
InRiver read as Inriver PIM
Informatica read as Informatica Product 360
Inriver read as Inriver PIM
SAP read as SAP Master Data Governance
Stibo Systems read as Stibo Systems STEP
Stibo Systems (STEP / Trusted Intelligence Platform) read as Stibo Systems STEP
Stibo Systems (STEP) read as Stibo Systems STEP
inRiver read as Inriver PIM
inriver read as Inriver PIM
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe Commerce (Magento) product management
Agility PIM
BluestonePIM
Centric PXM
Comestri PIM
Informatica MDM – Product 360
Informatica PIM
Jasper PIM
Oracle
Pimcore open core
Ply
Precisely EnterWorks
SAP Commerce Cloud PIM
Salesforce
Salesforce Commerce Cloud catalogs
Shopify's native product catalog
Sitation
Stibo STEP
Stibo Systems Product Experience Data Cloud
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.