GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Akeneo Product Cloud · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Akeneo Product Cloud

3Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Akeneo Product Cloud was named 1 time in PIM, where Plytix led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market10 of 68

under the label threshold

Enterprise15 of 57

under the label threshold

In pim · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Akeneo Product Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Product information management	Revenue operations	2%	10 of 68	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Plytix at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Akeneo Product Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Akeneo Product Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Plytix or Akeneo would be the strongest starting points” MiniMax M2.5 · PIM · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Akeneo Product Cloud, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Akeneo Product Cloud was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stibo Systems STEP2 of 31Not among the top eight

Inriver PIM2 of 30Not among the top eight

Pimcore2 of 30Not among the top eight

Informatica Product 3601 of 31Not among the top eight

Perfion1 of 30Not among the top eight

Pimberly1 of 30Not among the top eight

Plytix1 of 30Not among the top eight

SAP PIM1 of 30Not among the top eight

Syndigo1 of 30Not among the top eight

Tenovos1 of 30Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Akeneo Product Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Akeneo Product Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

omr.com2

atropim.com1

checkthat.ai1

dragonflyai.co1

gartner.com1

gitnux.org1

guideflow.com1

help.akeneo.comYour site1

inriver.com1

itechguides.com1

Ten of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Akeneo Product Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

omr.com/en/reviews/contenthub/best-pim-systems2

atropim.com/en/blog/pim-software-companies1

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-product-information-management-software-solutions1

dragonflyai.co/resources/blog/best-product-information-management-software-top-10-pim-prov1

gartner.com/reviews/market/product-information-management-solutions1

gitnux.org/best/p-i-m-software1

guideflow.com/blog/product-information-management-software1

help.akeneo.com/akeneo-pim1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

akeneo.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Akeneo Product Cloud takes 2% of first choices and Plytix takes 34%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “product information management system”

Position for “best product information management system”

Organic visits to its site: about 33,435 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,123 · 135 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,545
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

20 ads · 20 text · 13 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2025, as Akeneo Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 20 in the year. 5 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 68 in PIM

Segment leader

34%

Plytix

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 3 answers
Its own site cited: in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on akeneo.com

4,489

subdomains included

Content

1,130

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,345

Product · Integration

1 · 5

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	509	10	2026-09-28	DAM, Direct mail
News or press	147	3	2026-09-23	SEO, DAM
Glossary or explainer	140	3	2026-09-18	DAM, SEO
Case study	131	19	2026-09-21
Report or ebook	110	9	2026-09-23	DAM
Podcast or video	41	1	2026-09-23
Conference or event	29	0	2022-09-08
Comparison	14	0	2026-05-15	SEO, DAM
Webinar or virtual event	9	0	2021-03-01

Most recent

2026-09-282026 isg pim pxm buyers guides blog
2026-09-25The 10 ai agents every product data team should be planning for blog
2026-09-23Akeneo survey finds shoppers no longer take prices at face value news or press
2026-09-23Accelerating product supplier onboarding for modern commerce podcast or video
2026-09-23The agentic pim playbook report or ebook
2026-09-21Decathlon case study

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page akeneo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name DAM (10); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Akeneo Product Cloud

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Akeneo Product Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Akeneo Product Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Akeneo Product Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Akeneo Product Cloud is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Akeneo Product Cloud, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.