Every category where a model named Plytix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Product information management	Revenue operations	34%	1 of 68	4%	48	endorsed leader
Digital asset management	Marketing	0%	21 of 70	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Canto at 45%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Plytix yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Plytix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	0	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2	0	4
Grok 4.20	1	3	1	0	5
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	1	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	2	0	0	4
Kimi K2	3	1	0	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	0	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	1	0	4
GPT-6 Luna	1	1	1	0	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct27 labels20

Paraphrase27 labels14

Comparative27 labels13not counted in share

Budget-constrained33 labels24

Scale-constrained8 labels5

Negative14 labels9not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative136 labels in all, every segment counted; 63 of the 85 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the strongest all-around choice is usually Plytix if you want a low-cost, easy-to-use cloud PIM with built-in DAM and simple setup” Perplexity Sonar · PIM · budget prompt · first choice

“Plytix or Akeneo would be the strongest starting points, with Plytix being more budget-friendly and purpose-built for B2B” MiniMax M2.5 · PIM · direct prompt · first choice

“Plytix is widely considered the gold standard for small-to-medium businesses (SMBs) because of its transparent pricing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PIM · budget prompt · first choice

“Plytix is the best overall choice due to its B2B-focused design, ease of use, and partner collaboration features” Mistral Small · PIM · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited flexibility: Restrictive for automation and workflow management” Kimi K2 · PIM · negative prompt · soft negative

“good for SMBs but may need upgrades for large B2B catalogs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PIM · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Plytix, over the 136 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plytix was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Akeneo PIM95 of 13613Compare →

Pimcore71 of 1366Compare →

Sales Layer66 of 1368Compare →

Inriver PIM58 of 1363Compare →

Salsify48 of 1364Not among the top eight

Catsy34 of 1360Not among the top eight

Pimberly23 of 1360Not among the top eight

Syndigo22 of 1360Not among the top eight

Akeneo Community Edition16 of 1361Not among the top eight

OneTimePIM16 of 1360Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Plytix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 133 of the 136 answers that named Plytix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

plytix.comYour site100

inriver.com92

atropim.com80

g2.com59

learn.g2.com51

netguru.com49

omr.com43

akeneo.com41

checkthat.ai35

pimcore.com30

480 of the 580 domain citations in answers naming Plytix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

plytix.com/blog/best-pim65

atropim.com/en/blog/pim-software-comparison59

inriver.com/resources/best-pim-software52

learn.g2.com/best-pim-software49

netguru.com/blog/pim-for-b2b42

atropim.com/en/blog/pim-software-companies39

inriver.com/resources/best-pim-solutions39

g2.com/categories/product-information-management-pim37

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Plytix stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “product information management system”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best product information management system”

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“plytix”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 12 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 6,008 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,823 · 95 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,477
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

22 ads · 14 text, 8 video · 13 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Plytix SLU, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 10 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

34%

rank 1 of 68 in PIM

First choices

across its categories

Named in: 136 answers
Its own site cited: in 133 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on plytix.com

791

subdomains included

Content

321

counted in the table below

Documentation

214

Product · Integration

1 · 4

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	184	4	2026-08-28	SEO, Ecommerce
News or press	46	1	2026-09-18	Product analytics
Report or ebook	35	14	2026-09-08
Comparison	24	0	2026-03-20	DAM
Case study	21	0	2026-06-24
Glossary or explainer	10	0	2026-02-13
Template or tool	1	0	2025-03-17

Most recent

2026-09-18Make partnership news or press
2026-09-08Product content ai use cases report or ebook
2026-08-28Shopify pim blog
2026-08-25Product content optimization report or ebook
2026-08-25Product feed formatting report or ebook
2026-08-06The cpg napkin 2025 report report or ebook

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page plytix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Plytix

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Plytix is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: PIM, DAM & AI Product Content Platform
plytix.com
For: brands, manufacturers, retailers, and distributors that sell across multiple channels; built for B2B and B2C businesses with marketing and ecommerce teams
plytix.com
Price stated: Standard: Starting at $0/mo; Pro: Starting at $149/mo; Enterprise: Starting at $699/mo plytix.com
Starting price: 0 plytix.com
Free plan or trial: Our standard plan is 100% free, forever. There’s no trial period and no looming expiration date. Free pilot available, unlimited time. plytix.com
Certifications: certified Plytix specialists
Customers named: Al Fakher Holding USARite in the RainWholesome GoodsDanfoss Fire SafetyTie Down
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What Plytix's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: plytix.com, plytix.com/pricing, plytix.com/features, plytix.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plytix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plytix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Plytix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Plytix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Plytix, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Plytix is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

AI models recommend Plytix first in Product information management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/product-information-management/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/plytix--product-information-management-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Product information management, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Product information management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/product-information-management/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/plytix--product-information-management-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Product information management, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Product information management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/revops/product-information-management/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/plytix--product-information-management-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Product information management, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Product information management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.