Every category where a model named OneTimePIM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Product information management	Revenue operations	0%	26 of 68	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Plytix at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OneTimePIM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OneTimePIM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Designed specifically for efficient data import, organization, and sharing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PIM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OneTimePIM, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OneTimePIM was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Plytix16 of 1714Not among the top eight

Akeneo PIM10 of 170Not among the top eight

Sales Layer9 of 170Not among the top eight

Pimcore8 of 170Not among the top eight

Ergonode7 of 170Not among the top eight

AtroPIM4 of 170Not among the top eight

Catsy4 of 170Not among the top eight

Inriver PIM4 of 170Not among the top eight

Akeneo Community Edition3 of 171Not among the top eight

PIMinto2 of 171Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OneTimePIM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named OneTimePIM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com16

atropim.com14

plytix.com13

learn.g2.com11

inriver.com9

sourceforge.net8

elsner.com7

netguru.com7

blog.marketingblatt.com6

checkthat.ai6

No domain is on file for OneTimePIM, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

atropim.com/en/blog/pim-software-comparison14

atropim.com/en/blog/pim-software-companies13

learn.g2.com/best-pim-software11

g2.com/categories/product-information-management-pim10

atropim.com/en/blog/pim-software-with-best-customer-reviews9

g2.com/categories/product-information-management-pim/small-business9

elsner.com/best-pim-software7

netguru.com/blog/pim-for-b2b7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where OneTimePIM stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“onetimepim”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 26 of 68 in PIM

Segment leader

34%

Plytix

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 17 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow OneTimePIM

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OneTimePIM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OneTimePIM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OneTimePIM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where OneTimePIM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name OneTimePIM, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.