GTM AI Index
Index Marketing Video hosting › YouTube vs Gumlet
Video marketing and hosting · September 2026 Edition

YouTube vs Gumlet

Zero of twelve models named YouTube first on the direct prompt; zero named Gumlet. YouTube was named by twelve of the twelve models and Gumlet by ten and YouTube carries 46 labels and Gumlet 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.

YouTube

criticized challenger

San Bruno, United States, founded 2005. Named in four categories this edition.

Gumlet

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share15%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate50%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels4633A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, YouTube reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Wistia was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. Wistia vs YouTube · Wistia vs Gumlet · Vidyard vs YouTube

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video marketing and hosting page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
YouTubeFirst choices, of twelve modelsGumlet
Direct003 against YouTube · 1 against Gumlet
Paraphrase011 against YouTube
Comparative302 against YouTube
Budget-constrained811 against YouTube
Scale-constrained005 against YouTube
Negative1211 against YouTube
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, YouTube and Gumlet were named in the same answer forty-four times, of the 121 answers naming YouTube and the 78 naming Gumlet. In those answers Gumlet took the first choice six times and YouTube five.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where YouTube and Gumlet stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
YouTube Gumlet first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, YouTube on the left and Gumlet on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where YouTube and Gumlet stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Llama 4 MaverickWistia alternatives: Gumlet, Vimeo
Qwen 3.7 FlashWistia alternatives: Gumlet, Vidyard, Vimeo
GLM 4.7 FlashXWistia alternatives: Gumlet, Vidyard, Vimeo

Neither was named

9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Vimeo, Wistia alternatives: Cinema8, Goldcast, Vidyard
GPT-5.4 miniWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Gemini 3.5 FlashWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Perplexity SonarWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Grok 4.1 FastWistia alternatives: Vidyard
Mistral SmallVidyard, Wistia alternatives: Vimeo
DeepSeek V4 FlashWistia alternatives: HubSpot Video, Vidyard
Kimi K2Wistia alternatives: SproutVideo, Vidyard, Vimeo
MiniMax M2.5Wistia alternatives: Bunny Stream, Dacast, Vidyard, Vimeo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
YouTube leads by twelve points.
YouTube16%#2 of 9
Gumlet4%#4 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
YouTube leads by eleven points.
YouTube15%#3 of 8
Gumlet4%#5 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Gumlet leads at enterprise.
Gumlet9%#4 of 7
YouTube0%#7 of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about YouTube

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Platforms to Avoid or Use with Caution... 1. YouTube (for business marketing) Key Issues: Complete loss of control” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid or Limit as Primary Hosts (High Risks for Marketing)... use it only as a complement, not your main host.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“the main platforms to avoid or be cautious about are usually public/social platforms like YouTube” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Start with YouTube if your primary goal is brand awareness and reaching new audiences. It's completely free and offers the widest distribution.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“the best overall choice is usually YouTube if your main goal is reach and awareness, because it is free” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“YouTube is the best starting point due to its cost (free), massive audience, and decent built-in tools” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Gumlet

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Lack Wistia's marketing-specific tools (e.g., no deep heatmaps/forms).” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · soft negative
“"Goldilocks" middle path—strong security, modern streaming tech, and analytics that plug into your existing stack without enterprise complexity.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“An incredibly affordable, modern video infrastructure host that offers premium features for a fraction of the cost.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Gumlet | Secure business hosting | Full security stack (DRM, domain locking, geo-fencing) from $25/month” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.