Vidyard vs Gumlet
One of twelve models named Vidyard first on the direct prompt; zero named Gumlet. Vidyard was named by twelve of the twelve models and Gumlet by ten and Vidyard carries 53 labels and Gumlet 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Kitchener, Canada, founded 2011. Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video marketing and hosting page.
By framing
VidyardFirst choices, of twelve modelsGumlet
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Vidyard and Gumlet were named in the same answer sixty-three times, of the 161 answers naming Vidyard and the 78 naming Gumlet. In those answers Gumlet took the first choice ten times and Vidyard eight.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |
Vidyard Gumlet first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Vidyard on the left and Gumlet on the right.The direct prompt
Vidyard first, Gumlet not the choice
1 of 12 modelsGumlet was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
11 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Vidyard16%#2 of 8Gumlet4%#5 of 8What the models said about Vidyard
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“enterprise-tier Vidyard or Wistia are incredible tools. However, small-to-mid-sized businesses should be highly cautious of their pricing structures.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Vidyard/Wistia (entry plans): Excellent for leads/CRM but per-seat or per-video pricing explodes at scale” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Vidyard offers the best balance of sales enablement features and reasonable pricing” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“If your primary goal is empowering your sales development reps ... Vidyard is the superior tool.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one platform for a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd lean toward Vidyard” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Gumlet
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Lack Wistia's marketing-specific tools (e.g., no deep heatmaps/forms).” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · soft negative
“"Goldilocks" middle path—strong security, modern streaming tech, and analytics that plug into your existing stack without enterprise complexity.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“An incredibly affordable, modern video infrastructure host that offers premium features for a fraction of the cost.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Gumlet | Secure business hosting | Full security stack (DRM, domain locking, geo-fencing) from $25/month” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.