AdRoll ABM vs Apollo.io
Eleven of twelve models named AdRoll ABM first on the direct prompt; zero named Apollo.io. AdRoll ABM was named by twelve of the twelve models and Apollo.io by ten and AdRoll ABM carries 67 labels and Apollo.io 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By AdRoll, San Francisco, United States, founded 2007. Named in ten categories this edition.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the account-based marketing platforms page.
By framing
AdRoll ABMFirst choices, of twelve modelsApollo.io
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | | |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | |
AdRoll ABM Apollo.io first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, AdRoll ABM on the left and Apollo.io on the right.The direct prompt
AdRoll ABM first, Apollo.io not the choice
11 of 12 modelsApollo.io was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
AdRoll ABM20%#2 of 13Apollo.io16%#3 of 13AdRoll ABM56%#1 of 11Apollo.io4%#5 of 11AdRoll ABM0%#7 of 8Apollo.io0%#– of 8What the models said about AdRoll ABM
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Enterprise tools (RollWorks ~$12K/yr, Demandbase) are overkill/too costly.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Renamed to AdRoll ABM (Aug 2025) | Same product, different name — reviews may be split” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“RollWorks / AdRoll ABM (Be cautious of: Ad-only limitations and superficial metrics)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best account-based marketing platform for a company with a limited budget is RollWorks, which is an approachable and budget-friendly ABM tool” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend RollWorks / AdRoll ABM if your priority is fast setup, practical ABM, and a more approachable mid-market fit” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with RollWorks if you need a dedicated ABM platform, as it's specifically designed for mid-market companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Apollo.io
No label in this category carried a quote.
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.