GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Zinrelo · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Zinrelo

16Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Loyalty for mid-market buyers
Rank 10 of 124 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In loyalty · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zinrelo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Loyalty, advocacy and referralsMarketing2%10 of 1240%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zinrelo yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zinrelo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210102
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend starting with Referral Rock or Zinrelo” Kimi K2 · Loyalty · direct prompt · first choice
“best suited for mid-market B2B companies looking for a data-driven approach to retention” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Loyalty · direct prompt · alternative
“Zinrelo (Best for Data-Driven Loyalty)” MiniMax M2.5 · Loyalty · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zinrelo, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zinrelo was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Smile.io10 of 162Not in the top three
Referral Rock10 of 161Not in the top three
Antavo10 of 160Not in the top three
Friendbuy9 of 160Not in the top three
LoyaltyLion9 of 160Not in the top three
Extole8 of 161Not in the top three
Talon.One7 of 162Not in the top three
Annex Cloud7 of 161Not in the top three
GrowSurf7 of 161Not in the top three
Open Loyalty7 of 160Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zinrelo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 16 answers that named Zinrelo and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Zinrelo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zinrelo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Annex Cloud/Zinrelo 1Zinrelo (True Loyal) 1Zinrelo (now TrueLoyal) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zinrelo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zinrelo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zinrelo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.