Every category where a model named Wellows for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools	Marketing	6%	7 of 119	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wellows yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wellows across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labels5

Paraphrase5 labels2

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wellows is likely your best starting point — it offers the full five-engine coverage on entry-level plans at $29/month” MiniMax M2.5 · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice

“Wellows - Best overall for tracking AI citations and acting on the gaps” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice

“the best all-around choice is usually Wellows” Perplexity Sonar · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice

“Wellows — Best for acting on citations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI visibility · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wellows, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wellows was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Otterly17 of 224Not in the top three

Profound14 of 223Not in the top three

Peec AI10 of 221Not in the top three

Peek9 of 220Not in the top three

Frase4 of 220Not in the top three

Scrunch3 of 220Not in the top three

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit3 of 220Not in the top three

Conductor2 of 222Not in the top three

Ahrefs Brand Radar2 of 220Not in the top three

Botify2 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wellows. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 22 answers that named Wellows and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

alhena.ai5

gracker.ai5

kime.ai5

wellows.comYour site5

flint.com4

ailedgrowth.com3

amplitude.com3

mybrandi.ai3

supermarketers.ai3

trakkr.ai3

Thirty-four of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Wellows came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gracker.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-b2b-saas5

kime.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools5

wellows.com/blog/ai-visibility-tools5

flint.com/articles/best-ai-visibility-tracking-tools4

ailedgrowth.com/learn/best-ai-search-visibility-tracking-tools3

alhena.ai/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools-ecommerce3

amplitude.com/compare/best-ai-visibility-tools3

mybrandi.ai/best-ai-visibility-tools-brands3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wellows's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wellows, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wellows.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.