AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Gauge · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Gauge

6Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gauge was named 1 time in AI visibility, where Otterly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Gauge for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI visibility and answer engine tracking toolsMarketing0%51 of 900%1under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Gauge held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · AI visibility · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 87 → 82 of 92
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 → 49 of 85
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 49 → 38 of 74

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
AI visibility0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 28 → 51 of 90

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Gauge across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Actionable optimization suite with content‑audit and workflow tools.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI visibility · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gauge, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gauge was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Peec AI4 of 60Not among the top eight
Profound3 of 61Not among the top eight
Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit3 of 61Not among the top eight
Wellows3 of 61Not among the top eight
HubSpot AEO Grader3 of 60Not among the top eight
AirOps2 of 61Not among the top eight
Otterly2 of 61Not among the top eight
Rankscale2 of 61Not among the top eight
Writesonic GEO2 of 61Not among the top eight
AIclicks.io1 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gauge. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Gauge and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airops.com4
blog.hubspot.com4
tryprofound.com4
wellows.com4
business.com3
geoptie.com2
gracker.ai2
hubspot.com2
withgauge.comYour site2
writesonic.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Gauge came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on withgauge.com
360
subdomains included
Content
140
counted in the table below
Documentation
184
Product · Integration
8 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog108undatedSEO, AI marketing agents
Comparison19undatedSEO
Report or ebook7undated
Glossary or explainer5undated
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page withgauge.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Gauge

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gauge; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gauge (formerly Gauge.ai) 1

Follow Gauge

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Gauge is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Visibility & GEO Platform
For
marketers
Price stated
Gauge offers two plans: Growth (most popular) - $599 monthly for 600 prompts run through all leading models daily with 18 articles created by Gauge's content engine monthly Enterprise - custom plans and pricing for larger firms withgauge.com
Starting price
599 withgauge.com
Free plan or trial
Start for free withgauge.com
Integrations claimed
3 withgauge.com/pricing · 4 withgauge.com/features/ask-gauge pages disagree
Hosting
San FranciscoUS
Customers named
MotherDuckBraintrustSupabasePostHogResendMintlifyVellumAmpa Health
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications

What Gauge's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: withgauge.com, withgauge.com/pricing, trust.withgauge.com, withgauge.com/features/ask-gauge. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gauge's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gauge, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gauge by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Gauge is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gauge, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at withgauge.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.