GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Surefire Local · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Surefire Local

13Judge labels

4First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Surefire Local was named 3 times in Channel marketing and 1 other category, where JourneyBee led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business19 of 128

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 108

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Surefire Local for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	2%	15 of 108	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Retail, proximity and IoT marketing	Marketing	0%	76 of 131	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Radar at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Surefire Local yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Surefire Local across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labels3

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: Surefire Local” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“All-in-One Alternative: Surefire Local” Kimi K2 · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best All-in-One for Small Businesses” MiniMax M2.5 · Proximity · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Surefire Local, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Surefire Local was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Birdeye5 of 131Not in the top three

Google Business Profile5 of 131Not in the top three

Foursquare4 of 131Not in the top three

Channelscaler2 of 131Not in the top three

ContactID2 of 131Not in the top three

Estimote2 of 131Not in the top three

Euler App2 of 131Not in the top three

GroundTruth2 of 131Not in the top three

PartnerStack2 of 131Not in the top three

SE Ranking2 of 131Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Surefire Local. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 13 answers that named Surefire Local and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ansira.com1

brandid.app1

coldiq.com1

f6s.com1

fundbox.com1

g2.com1

gartner.com1

geoapify.com1

guideflow.com1

leadscrape.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Surefire Local came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ansira.com/blog/local-marketing-tools1

brandid.app/blog/local-marketing-software1

coldiq.com/category/location-based-marketing1

f6s.com/software/category/geomarketing1

f6s.com/software/category/hyperlocal-targeting1

f6s.com/software/category/location-based-lead-generation1

f6s.com/software/category/location-based-marketing1

fundbox.com/blog/7-local-marketing-platforms-small-business1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Surefire Local's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Surefire Local, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at surefirelocal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.