GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › SEOptimer · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

SEOptimer

8Judge labels

1First choices

3Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SEOptimer was named 5 times in AI visibility and 1 other category, where Otterly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business61 of 107

under the label threshold

Mid-market17 of 119

under the label threshold

Enterprise86 of 111

under the label threshold

In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SEOptimer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools	Marketing	2%	17 of 119	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20%
SEO and content optimization platforms	Marketing	0%	113 of 113	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Surfer SEO at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SEOptimer yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SEOptimer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best AI visibility and answer engine tracking tool for a company with a limited budget is SEOptimer, which starts at $29/month” Llama 4 Maverick · AI visibility · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the 5-year pattern of billing issues warrants using a virtual card and documenting everything” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SEO · negative prompt · soft negative

“Billing concerns: Historical unauthorized post-cancellation charges” Mistral Small · SEO · negative prompt · soft negative

“Historical unauthorized charges, support delays (improved recently).” Grok 4.1 Fast · SEO · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SEOptimer, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SEOptimer was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Surfer SEO4 of 81Not in the top three

Frase4 of 80Not in the top three

Ahrefs3 of 81Not in the top three

Clearscope3 of 81Not in the top three

Otterly3 of 81Not in the top three

Profound3 of 81Not in the top three

Google Analytics 43 of 80Not in the top three

Google Search Console3 of 80Not in the top three

Peec AI3 of 80Not in the top three

Semrush3 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SEOptimer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SEOptimer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at seoptimer.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.