GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Screaming Frog SEO Spider · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Screaming Frog SEO Spider

5Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Screaming Frog SEO Spider was named 3 times in SEO, where Surfer SEO led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business45 of 103

under the label threshold

Mid-market31 of 113

under the label threshold

Enterprise64 of 74

under the label threshold

In seo · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Screaming Frog SEO Spider for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SEO and content optimization platforms	Marketing	0%	31 of 113	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Surfer SEO at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Screaming Frog SEO Spider yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Screaming Frog SEO Spider across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Screaming Frog is the gold standard for technical audits” Mistral Small · SEO · comparative prompt · alternative

“No other tool replaces it for local technical auditing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SEO · comparative prompt · alternative

“(free up to 500 URLs): Technical crawls/audits.” Grok 4.1 Fast · SEO · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Screaming Frog SEO Spider, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Screaming Frog SEO Spider was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ahrefs5 of 52Not in the top three

Semrush5 of 52Not in the top three

Frase4 of 50Not in the top three

Surfer SEO4 of 50Not in the top three

Google Analytics 43 of 50Not in the top three

Google Search Console3 of 50Not in the top three

Moz3 of 50Not in the top three

NeuronWriter3 of 50Not in the top three

Rank Math3 of 50Not in the top three

SE Ranking3 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Screaming Frog SEO Spider. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 5 answers that named Screaming Frog SEO Spider and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brightedge.com1

conductor.com1

ewrdigital.com1

gartner.com1

ibeamconsulting.com1

konabayev.com1

saasgenius.com1

searchatlas.com1

searcheye.io1

searchneedslove.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Screaming Frog SEO Spider came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

brightedge.com/blog/enterprise-seo-platforms-vs-seo-tools-choosing-the-right-solution-for-1

conductor.com/academy/best-enterprise-seo-platforms1

ewrdigital.com/blog/best-enterprise-seo-tools-platforms-software1

gartner.com/reviews/market/enterprise-seo-platforms1

ibeamconsulting.com/blog/group-buy-seo-tools-pros-cons1

konabayev.com/blog/enterprise-seo-tools1

saasgenius.com/blog-business/top-botify-competitors-and-alternatives1

searchatlas.com/blog/seoclarity-alternatives1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Screaming Frog SEO Spider's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Screaming Frog SEO Spider, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at screamingfrogseospider.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.