GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Reclaim.ai · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Reclaim.ai

14Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Reclaim.ai was named 6 times in Scheduling, where Calendly led with 59%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business18 of 65

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise12 of 92

under the label threshold

In scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Reclaim.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	0%	12 of 77	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Reclaim.ai yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Reclaim.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative13 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best AI-Powered ... If you want your calendar to intelligently protect focus time and auto-optimize, go with Reclaim.ai.” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice

“AI-powered calendar assistant that schedules meetings while actively defending your personal productivity” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Strong for AI-driven time blocking and team analytics.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“For team analytics and prioritization: Reclaim” MiniMax M2.5 · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Reclaim.ai, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reclaim.ai was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly14 of 1412Not in the top three

Cal.com11 of 141Not in the top three

Doodle9 of 140Not in the top three

SavvyCal9 of 140Not in the top three

Clockwise6 of 140Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling5 of 140Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings5 of 140Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe5 of 140Not in the top three

Google Calendar4 of 141Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings4 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reclaim.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 14 answers that named Reclaim.ai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bigcontacts.com1

educba.com1

guideflow.com1

peoplemanagingpeople.com1

pumble.com1

ronspotflexwork.com1

ustechautomations.com1

zoho.com1

Eight of the eight domain citations in answers naming Reclaim.ai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bigcontacts.com/blog/best-group-scheduling-tools1

educba.com/meeting-scheduling-tools1

guideflow.com/blog/online-appointment-scheduling-software-tools1

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-meeting-scheduling-software1

pumble.com/blog/best-meeting-scheduler-apps1

ronspotflexwork.com/blog/business-scheduling-tools1

ustechautomations.com/resources/blog/best-scheduling-software-small-business-20261

zoho.com/bookings/explore/meeting-scheduling-tools.html1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Reclaim.ai

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Reclaim.ai; a claim can dispute any of them.

Reclaim 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reclaim.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reclaim.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at reclaim.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.