GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Google Calendar · September 2026 Edition

Google · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Google Calendar

14Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Google Calendar was named 7 times in Scheduling, where Calendly led with 59%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 65

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprise20 of 92

under the label threshold

In scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Calendar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Meeting scheduling	Sales	0%	16 of 77	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Calendar yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Calendar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative8 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“if you want the simplest option inside the productivity suite you already use” Perplexity Sonar · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“best if you want a very low-cost/simple option” GPT-5.4 mini · Scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

“Best Free Google-Native Option” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Free/Consumer Versions Generally (e.g., basic Google Calendar... Lack BAAs, full encryption, audit logs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Calendar, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Calendar was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly13 of 148Not in the top three

Doodle9 of 140Not in the top three

Cal.com6 of 142Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings6 of 141Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling6 of 140Not in the top three

SavvyCal6 of 140Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe6 of 140Not in the top three

HubSpot Meetings5 of 140Not in the top three

Reclaim.ai4 of 140Not in the top three

WhenAvailable3 of 142Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Calendar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 14 answers that named Google Calendar and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com3

calendly.com2

gitnux.org2

manyreach.com2

meetergo.com2

peoplemanagingpeople.com2

pumble.com2

ronspotflexwork.com2

serviceform.com2

whenavailable.com2

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Google Calendar came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gitnux.org/best/meeting-scheduler-software2

guideflow.com/blog/online-appointment-scheduling-software-tools2

manyreach.com/blog/meeting-scheduling-tools2

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-meeting-scheduling-software2

pumble.com/blog/best-meeting-scheduler-apps2

ronspotflexwork.com/blog/business-scheduling-tools2

whenavailable.com/blog/group-meeting-scheduler2

zapier.com/blog/best-meeting-scheduler-apps2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Google Calendar

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Calendar; a claim can dispute any of them.

Google Calendar Appointment Schedules 3Google Calendar appointment schedules 1

The company

Google Search is the company behind Google Calendar.

Website: google.com
Headquarters: United States
Founded: 1997

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Calendar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Calendar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.