GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Plotly Dash Enterprise · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Plotly Dash Enterprise

3Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
1 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Plotly Dash Enterprise was named 1 time in Territory planning, where CaptivateIQ led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Plotly Dash Enterprise for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Territory and quota planningRevenue operations0%94 of 103100%1under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Plotly Dash Enterprise yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Plotly Dash Enterprise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“one source specifically warns against relying on Plotly Dash Enterprise for routing math because it lacks a native territory modeling module” Perplexity Sonar · Territory planning · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Plotly Dash Enterprise, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plotly Dash Enterprise was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Spreadsheets3 of 30Not in the top three
Varicent2 of 31Not in the top three
Fullcast2 of 30Not in the top three
Anaplan1 of 31Not in the top three
Badger Maps1 of 30Not in the top three
MapBusinessOnline1 of 30Not in the top three
Maptitude1 of 30Not in the top three
Maptive1 of 30Not in the top three
SAP Territory and Quota1 of 30Not in the top three
Salesforce ecosystem1 of 30Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Plotly Dash Enterprise. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Plotly Dash Enterprise and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

articsledge.com3
captivateiq.com3
everstage.com3
gradient.works3
guideflow.com3
pipeline.zoominfo.com3
prolifiq.com3
prospeo.io3
reddit.com3
salesmotion.io3

Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Plotly Dash Enterprise came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plotly Dash Enterprise's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plotly Dash Enterprise, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at plotly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack